Gamblers Fallacy Essay

1477 Words3 Pages

The gambler’s fallacy is defined as an (incorrect) belief in negative autocorrelation of a non-autocorrelated random sequence.1 For example, individuals who believe in the gambler’s fallacy believe that after three red numbers appearing on the roulette wheel, a black number is “due,” that is, is more likely to appear than a red number ( SUNDALI & CROSON, 2006). The law of probability, follows a random walk for which past event or pattern have no influence to predict the outcome yet under the concept of gambler’s fallacy , an individual predicts the outcome of a certain random event with negative auto correlation , meaning an individual under the influence of gambler’s fallacy would believe that the same outcome of an event is less likely to When luck is with you, you can win in spite of low chance of winning; when luck is not with you, you could 12 fail even with a good chance of winning. The hot-hand fallacy and gamblers’ fallacy are assumed to be common among gamblers because it is thought that they have a strong tendency to believe that outcomes for future bets are predictable from those of previous ones. In chapter 4, a mechanism of the gamblers' fallacy creating the hothand effect will be revealed. Belief in a hot-hand is “If you have been winning, you are more likely to win again.” The term “hot hand” was initially used in basketball to describe a basketball player who had been very successful in scoring over a short period. It was believed that such a player had a “hot hand” and that other players should pass the ball to him to score more. This term is now used more generally to describe someone who is winning persistently and can be regarded as “in luck”. In gambling scenarios, a player with a genuine hot hand should keep betting and bet more. There have been extensive discussions about the existence of the hot hand effect. Some researchers have failed to find any evidence of such an effect (Gilovich, Vallone and Tversky, 1985)Others claim there is evidence of the hot hand effect in games that require considerable physical skill, such as golf, darts, and basketball (Gilden and Wilson, 1995; Arkes, 2011; Yaari and Eisenmann, 2011). People gambling on sports outcomes may continue to do so after winning because they believe they have a hot hand. Such a belief may be a fallacy. It is, however, possible that their belief is reasonable. For example, on some occasions, they may realize that their betting strategy is producing profits and that it would be sensible to continue with it. Alternatively, a hot hand could arise from some change in their betting strategy. For example, after winning, they may modify their bets in 13 some way to increase their

Open Document