Galileo: An Argument Or Heretic?

644 Words2 Pages

Galileo is one of the greatest scientists in the world, especially at that moment. At that time, people were all acquiesce in geocentrism which was put forward by Eudoxus of Cnidus and improved by Aristotle. But Galileo came up with a new argument named heliocentrism. In a long time, people all believed that all planets circled by the earth. There is no doubt that it must be an astonishment that one day Galileo provided that all planets move around the sun. The Catholic believes that Galileo is a heretic because he violates doctrines. In that century Catholic leaders believe that God is the center of the whole universe and everyone should listen to the God.
Heliocentrism threatens the social status of the Catholic that’s why they consider Galileo …show more content…

In his opinion, Catholic put the religious in the wrong direction, the religious teach people how to save their soul, not the how the planets move around.
In my opinion, Galileo cannot be considered as a heretic, because he just claims the truth of the science and he never betrayed the catholic. Frankly speaking, he is a qualified Catholic.
His argument does not attack the Church. Truth has nothing to do with religion. Religious tells people how to save souls and how to cultivate virtue. It cannot tell people how to discover the truth or calculate correct answers. When I was in senior high school, my politics teacher told me that religion is the existence of subjective consciousness, is the spiritual life of people, belonging to the ideological component of the social superstructure. Science is the work of understanding and studying objective truth. Truth is a kind of objective existence. To some extent, we may say the two things may have something in common. But on an objective level, we should use

Open Document