Future Of Higher Education

1563 Words4 Pages

Introduction
In a recent Pew research article, “The Future of Higher Education”, college enrollment grew among all races and ethnic groups during this 16-year period (Anderson, Boyles, & Rainie, 2012). The article showed an increase of minority group students in a higher education institution. In 2012, Hispanics experienced the highest college enrollment growth in the past 16-year period, but only accounted for 9% of young adults (ages 25 to 29) with bachelor’s degrees (Anderson et al., 2012). According to the Pew research article, Anderson et al. (2012) states Hispanics are less likely than whites to enroll in a four-year college, attend a selective college and enroll full-time. Anderson et al. (2012) goes on to include that the majority of …show more content…

Padgett, Johnson, & Pascarella (2012), state that two factors for first-generation students not obtaining a bachelors degree is due to the significant disadvantage across, “first cognitive and secondly the psychosocial outcomes compared to students’ whose parents have at least some postsecondary education” (p. 245). According to the Sociologist theorist, Pierre Bourdieu (1991), the student’s social capital is one factor that could be limiting first generation college students from succeeding in navigating their way through the higher education academic environment. As stated by Anderson et al. (2012), with an increase of first-generation college students entering higher education has generated a concern for college officials in trying to assist students who are new to the college scenery, to succeed in their learning experience. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the success of first generation college students based on the resources that are provided for them on campus and the miscommunication between the departments that hinder the …show more content…

Betts (2009) goes on to list participants, which include students, faculty, academic advisor, and technical staff in the higher education setting who can become either a sender and/or a receiver. As stated by Betts (2009), as communication increases, simultaneously there is a greater opportunity for the message to be lost in translation due to technical interference. According to Coley et al. (2015), the ownership of the various programs and services in higher education are decentralized, with student issues handled by the department that seems best organized to address a particular issue or difficulty. For Gratz & Salem (1982), “decentralized environments fragmentation of effort occurs more frequently in the absence of a plan to coordinate and communicate about ways to address retention issues” (pg. 8-13). Betts (2009) includes in her article a national study of student retention practices supported that showed “75 percent of respondents reported that someone at their institution had some responsibility for coordinating efforts”, yet none of the respondents understood who or what were coordinating efforts currently in place between departments (para.

Open Document