Funding In Public Schools

Inside a house of a family with barely enough income to support themselves, the lyrical strains of the cadenza from the first movement of Tchaikovsky’s violin concerto in D Major echo, reverberating not only through the house, but through the bones of each person who hears it. Imagine the happiness unearthed by the emotion and chords expressed through that music, and how inspired both the musician and his family are by the success achieved through musical endeavors. Helping at-risk children pursue their musical interest is only one reason, however, for funding the arts. Funding the arts is an increasingly important issue due to budget cuts occurring in public schools. Channeling more funds into arts programs in public schools must occur because

A study conducted by Marguerite Roza, a University of Washington professor and a Gates Foundation Advisor, was reviewed by Jay P. Greene, a professor at University of Arkansas and a member of the George W. Bush Institute; it has shown that money in school systems is placed in places that differ from where educators say it will go. While teachers say that they want more funding for low-income individuals in the school system, most spending per student goes towards the students with higher incomes; similarly, other educators say that resources should be focused on core academic subjects such as history, reading, history, or math, but “per-pupil spending tends to be much higher for electives [and] extracurricular activities” (Greene). Also, teachers tend to be paid unequally; they are paid “according to their credentials, seniority, and ‘additional’ work assignments and not at all according to subject taught, number of students served, or the difficulty or importance of their assignments” (Greene). Since salary may be based on an educator’s past and not on their present, a more educated teacher may choose to serve a school or district that offers them more money. This means that the less-learned teachers with lower funding may generally end up teaching the low-income students, allowing for less pay for the subjects that these teachers teach. Schools like these, and the schools with the more experienced teachers, receive “slightly more funding from the district, with higher WSI (Weighted Student Index) by 0.01 and 0.04, respectively. In other words, these schools typically received 1 to 4 percent more than the district average, or $15,000 to $60,000 per school of 500 students in a district where the average school expenditure is $3,000 per pupil” (Guin et al). The inequality of expenditures in