Functionalist Perspective

700 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Sociological perspectives

According to the text book “Social Problems: Community, Policy, and Social Action”, “A social problem is a social condition or pattern of behavior that has negative consequences for individuals, our social world, or our physical world.” (Leon, 2012, p. 8). A way to help understand and solve these problems is by taking a look at them from different perspectives, one of those perspectives is known as the functionalist perspective. “The functionalist perspective, as its name suggests, examines the functions or consequences of the structure of society” (Leon, 2012, p. 13). The functionalist perspective is just one of several other viewpoints. The functionalist perspective differs from other perspectives because of its belief in social structures, while the feminist and conflict perspective hold true to their belief in conflict, and the interactionist perspective believes in interaction within society. With that being said, if there was any type of good order and discipline, such as laws to keep people on the straight path, society would break down from the viewpoint of the functionalist. Where as in that same scenario, feminist and conflict perspectives would say society would grow stronger due to conflict. From the interactionist perspective without laws people would have to depend on one another more for different resources causing more interaction within society. All of these perspectives take a different look at society as a whole and they also look at problems within society completely different which means their answers to resolve one issue differ tremendously. What could be consider a problem into society to one perspective may not be as important as another problem to a different perspective, like homelessness. Home... ... middle of paper ... ...have no job, meaning they would have to find another available job. If that worker was unable to find a job and support themselves inevitably they would be in poverty and suffer homelessness as well. Homelessness is definitely a problem within society, but it is also not the only problem.. Throughout the world society faces multiple issues ranging from: sickness, hunger, economic breakdowns, war, inequality, etc. All these issues have a different level of importance to not only those affected by it but by those who govern in those areas. As long as mankind inhabits this planet these issues will exists in one form or another. Society as a whole can help decrease the amount of these issues but it all depends on how society goes about it. Works Cited Leon-Guerro, A. (2012). Social Problems: Community, Policy, and Social Action (3rd ed) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Show More
Related

  • Public Policy Analysis: Gun Control

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gusfield, J. (2011). How Do We Decide What are Social Problems? Retrieved April 6, 2011 from http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/soc235ch02.html

    Read More

  • The Saints And The Roughnecks Summary

    1928 Words  | 4 Pages

    Structural Functionalism is the sociology theory that emphasizes how everything and everyone has a purpose in society. That each and every one of us is a puzzle piece that comes together in order to form a society, any missing puzzle piece would result in the downfall or shortcomings of the whole society. Whether this may be religion, education, economy, etc, all of these structures much work together in order to have a flourishing society where everyone works uniformly. Stability is achieved when everyone fulfills their duty is society.

    Read More

  • Functionalism In The Shawshank Redemption

    1117 Words  | 3 Pages

    Functionalism is a theory in which various social institutions and processes in society serve a significant function in order for society to continue

    Read More

  • Health Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    Functionalist state they do not concentrate on conflict or division within society. However, Durkheim does mention society is together by certain parts of the social system sharing values. If any of the above fails to work together, functionalists explain this as a ‘loss of social solidarity, a lack of integration or a loss of equilibrium’ (Jones 2003 p.38) the key conc...

    Read More

  • The Three Paradigms In Society

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominan...

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism Theory Of Gay Marriage

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they

    Read More

  • Three Sociological Perspectives

    1124 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The functionalist perspective is a sociological approach which emphasizes the way that parts of a society are structure to maintain its stability,"(Schaefer & Lamm, 1998). This perspective looks at a society in a positive manner and sees it as stable, with all the parts working together. Under the functionalist view every social aspect of a society contributes to the society's survival, and if not, the aspect is not passed to the next generation.

    Read More

  • Friday Night Lights: Structure Functional Theory

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    Functionalism views society as the stability and assimilation of a range of forces that function within it. While society is a separate entity with a life of its own, there are individual elements contributing to that stability. Functionalism as a sociological theory emphasizes assimilation rather than the dissociation of society. Therefore, the society is seen as a whole that is compromised of parts which give one another their identity and their function. The part, whether that is education, such as a school, or sports, such as a football team, operates in relation to the other parts, and cannot be entirely understood in isolation from the other parts. All the parts are interrelated, and when there is a disturbance in any one of the parts, is when you can see the interdependence. But what is important about this theory is that “there will always be some reorganization and tendency to restore equilibrium” (Wallace and Wolf 17). Functionalist do not believe it’s crucial that the people involved in the society to be aware of this interconnectedness anymore than the brain and heart consciously realize that they work together as an organism.

    Read More

  • Functionalism

    2227 Words  | 5 Pages

    Functionalism is a materialist stance in the philosophy of mind that argues that mental states are purely functional, and thus categorized by their input and output associations and causes, rather than by the physical makeup that constitutes its parts. In this manner, functionalism argues that as long as something operates as a conscious entity, then it is conscious. Block describes functionalism, discusses its inherent dilemmas, and then discusses a more scientifically-driven counter solution called psychofunctionalism and its failings as well. Although Block’s assertions are cogent and well-presented, the psychofunctionalist is able to provide counterarguments to support his viewpoint against Block’s criticisms. I shall argue that though both concepts are not without issue, functionalism appears to satisfy a more acceptable description that philosophers can admit over psychofunctionalism’s chauvinistic disposition that attempts to limit consciousness only to the human race.

    Read More

  • Major Sociological Perspective Essay

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the major sociological perspectives is Functionalism. Functionalism is centered around the work of Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and Robert Merton. Functionalism is described as a system of connected parts that are designed to achieve

    Read More

  • Understanding Eating Disorders

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Functionalism is the oldest and most commonly used theoretical approach used to understand social issues. Functionalism is a macrosociological perspective that presents the idea that society consists of different components working together to help a society function as one. Sociolog...

    Read More

  • Structural Functionalism Research Paper

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.

    Read More

  • Inequality In The Workplace

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Functionalists and conflict theorists have contradictory views on inequalities. Functionalists have a positive outlook on inequalities, whereas the conflict theory believes that any type of inequality leads to a disruption in society.

    Read More

  • Social Conflict Theories and Functionalism

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    .... Functionalism is much too conservative, and does not have a way to explain major changes in society. The conflict theory does not explain some of the more orderly and stable parts of society. They both make good points, and both have good arguments. I however, cannot endorse one over the other for the simple reason that they are both essentially wrong and right at the same time. A conflict theorist is correct in saying that money and power do give you special considerations, and conflicts are at the base of most social change, however, they are wrong in assuming that all social institutions are unstable. A functionalist is correct in saying that the society is made up of interdependent and interacting parts, but wrong in their conservative assumptions. A blend of the two would probably provide the greatest base for an argument and would probably be the most real.

    Read More

  • Critiques of Functionalism

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are many criticisms of functionalism and their theories: Ø Functionalist ideas almost portray humans as being autonomous and that only socialisation determines our lives. They do not really see humans as the unpredictable creatures they are, not possible to stray away from the predictable ideas that functionalists have of people. Too much stress is placed on harmony and the potential for conflict and its affects are generally ignored. Ø There is no recognition of difference by class, region or ethnic group. The functionalist picture is simply reflective of happy middle-class American families.

    Read More

More about Functionalist Perspective

Open Document