Fukushima Argumentative Essay

911 Words2 Pages

After the nuclear accident in Fukushima in 2011, I have been communicating with victims and received countless of irate calls from victims, but almost all of them repeat critics and anger to the central government. An enormous number local residents criticized our reconstruction policy to return to the evacuation areas. “You government must be willing to sacrifice us to evaluate the effect of exposure to low-level radioactive doses.” Or “Government does not have the right to think about the reconstruction because you know almost nothing about the local situation.” These were some typical words I have received. Facing an unprecedented situation, national consensus to return their home as soon as possible was not shared among local communities because the anxiety for the effect caused by radioactive doses, compensation paid for the evacuees, …show more content…

“I surely know nothing could be better by only complaining the past. Honestly speaking, I want to stop complaining and have a positive discussion. Now only elder people are left in my community because all the children and their parents excessively feared the radioactive doses and evacuated from this region. So this community will soon vanish without the environment for children to live safely.” His confession finally enabled me to identify what he really wanted to know; true understandings about radioactive doses, necessary decontamination of the area, and construction plan of a highway, which used to be planned to go through the region but stopped it after the nuclear accident. Soon I arranged an explanatory meeting with 20 members of his community. Different from other meetings, almost all the participants listened to my word. This was because Mr. Seino, guaranteed other community members that I was a reliable person. It means that a 20-member in a small community decided to stop being sticky to complaining the past and move forward to

Open Document