Frustration Sparknotes

923 Words2 Pages

In “Frustration”, Isaac Asimov selectively uses literary devices to uncover some of his own observations of society. The story is narrated through the perspective of Gelb and Peter, who discuss the matters of Old Man Hargrove and his desire to convert all the people with opposing ideologies into believing his own policies and morals through weaponry. Although the story is set in the distant future, the self-righteousness of the characters can be related to people in the present. Asimov addresses the fact that an egotistical person’s ability to think reasonably may be limited, resulting in his frustration when others, who do not share the same outlook on human civilization, reject his opinions. However, while such a character trait can be associated …show more content…

Peter explains to Gelb that a computer “..totally lacks a sense of self-righteousness[,]”(Page 431) which conveys that he understands a computer cannot be programmed to have its own beliefs and to believe that its opinions are the most ethical. As a result, it cannot fight a war based off of ideologies in place of humans, just as a person who has no sense of superiority would have no motivation to strive for victory in such a war. Self-righteousness is an important factor in developing society. Forceful changes in politics and civilization based off of opinions may produce both negative and positive effects to mankind itself, but they also contribute to the learning of mistakes and the overall development of communities. The story suggests that little self-righteousness in humankind contribute to a small drive to change as a whole. Provided that a lack of motivation results in a lack of effective revolutions, “The Frustration” depicts that a deficiency in self-righteousness maintains a static, unchanging …show more content…

Hargrove is the most self-righteous of the three, wishing to start a war constructed off of his own opinions. Gelb is also self-righteous as shown when he tells Peter that “[they’re] better than [the rebels] are.”(Pg 430). Peter is indifferent, as demonstrated by his response to Gelb’s statement saying how it’s “A difference in point of view.”(Page 430) With each character representing a different member of society, Asimov elaborates on the varying lengths each character is willing to go to express his morals and policies according to his sense of values. Hargrove represents a revolutionary who wishes to forcefully make the rebels follow his rules, demanding a drastic change in modern society for many citizens. His character is juxtaposed by Peter, who symbolizes a person with no sense of self-righteousness. He is unwilling to make all of society conform to his own opinions due to a lack of motivation. Peter only “helps” Hargrove in return for money, albeit he secretly knows that Hargrove’s demand is an impossible one. Nevertheless, one can see how each character affects modern day civilization based off their human traits shown through indirect

Open Document