Freud's Discontent Essay

1121 Words3 Pages

In Civilization and its Discontents, the Austrian psychiatrist, Sigmund Freud, diagnosed three sources of human discontent, “the superior power of nature, the feebleness of our own bodies and the inadequacy of the regulations which adjust the mutual relationships of human beings in the family, the state and society” (Citation). It is Freud’s main thesis that the first two sources of misery are mitigated by civilization, but the third source comes from civilization. Thus, Freud avers it is quite possible that human beings would be happier in a more primitive state. Freud builds his dissertation on the proposition that although society has come a long way in allowing human beings to become more and more like the mythic gods they once envisioned …show more content…

Once I have expounded Freud’s arguments in full, I will juxtapose his conviction with that of my own. Lastly, I will conclude this essay by encapsulating the perspectives and sentiments that have been presented. First, when speaking on the topic of the primordial human urges that are vexed by society, Freud chiefly focused on the instinct of Eros (libido/sexual love). According to Freud, “Reality shows us that civilization is not content with the ties we have so far allowed it. It aims at binding the members of the community together in a libidinal way… it summons up aim-inhibited libido on the largest scale so as to strengthen the communal bond by relations of friendship. In order for these aims to be fulfilled, a restriction upon sexual life is unavoidable” (Citation). In essence, Freud is explicating that civilization forges the …show more content…

Freud builds his entire argument around the specious notion that civilized society draws upon and restricts the libido of the individual as a way of promoting the necessary social affections for society to function. The fallacy in this claim lies in the fact that although they are closely associated with one another, sexuality and love are two psychological functions that can exist independent of each other; this idea will become quite apparent upon analysis of where the capacity for love and the drive for sex come from. The drive for sex is a biological urge that is extremely ancient. Organisms as primitive as reptiles have the drive to breed with each other, and one would have to go back hundreds of million before finding a common ancestor between humans and reptiles. Yet despite their desire for sex, reptiles are far from social creatures, quite the opposite. Their brains are incapable of experiencing any sort of love or affection. In fact, the only organisms that appear to be capable of love, affection, and social behavior are mammals, thus love is a relatively new phenomenon since the evolution of mammals took place quite recently (when compared to the amount of time that reptiles have been around). Interestingly, the very fact that other animals are capable of social behavior disproves Freud’s argument. If Freud was correct about society drawing on libido to promote cooperative behavior, it should

Open Document