More handpicked essays just for you.
Ways to prevent cyberbullying social media
Cyberbullying: What teachers and schools can do
Ways to prevent cyberbullying social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Freedom of Speech in the Era of Cyber Bullying
As we are living in the age of technology, we are seeing our youth being victimized by a new phenomenon of bullying, called cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is defined as the use of information and communication technologies such as email, cell phones and pager text messages, instant messaging, defamatory personal Web sites, and defamatory online personal polling Web sites, to support deliberate repeated and hostile behavior by an individual or group, which is intended to harm others. Cyberbullying can also employ media such as PDAs, blogs, and social networks (Beckstrom, 2008). This form of bullying is progressive because it can happen instantly due to the technology involved, whereas traditional bullying tends to take longer to evolve and happens
over an extended period of time. Since the Ryan Halligan case in 2003, there has been a string of cyberbullying suicides which have made states and school districts react by imposing policies to deter and essentially criminalize cyberbullying which happens on and off campus. The issue at hand is whether state legislature and school districts enacting laws and policies regarding students’ speech in terms of off campus cyber speech, is interfering with the students’ free speech rights. Three Supreme Court cases have been cited in recent cyberbullying cases, in the context of the speech of students and the authority of the school district; Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel v. Fraser (1986), Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988).
Prior to technological advances that enhance our personal communication, there were three landmark Supreme Court cases that regulated students’ speech and the schools ...
... middle of paper ...
...g fact sheet: a brief review of relevant legal and policy issues. Retrieved from www.cyberbullying.us
5. Newcomb, A. (2013, October 15). Teen charged in fatal cyberbullying case of rebecca
sedwick to remain in jail. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/US/teen-charged-fatal-cyberbullying-case-rebecca-sedwick-remain/story?id=20580689
6. NG, C. (2012, May 01). Georgia teen sues cyberbullying classmates. Retrieved from
http://abcnews.go.com/US/georgia-teen-alex-boston-sues-cyberbullying-classmates/story?id=16251586
7. Teicher Khadroo, S. (2010, April 1). Phoebe prince case a 'watershed' in fight against school bullying. The Christian Science Monitor, 1-2.
8. Willard, M.S., J.D., N. (2007, March). Cyberbullying legislations and school policies: where are the boundaries of the "schoolhouse gate" in the new virtual world? Retrieved from http://cyberbully.org
This is a case of great importance because it addresses the issue of the broadness of the First Amendment as well as student’s freedom of speech rights being limited based on vicinity and because they are students. From this case it can be concluded that the courts were indecisive in their decision making process and that they will continue to interpret the First Amendment to their suiting and not as it is written. Finally, schools do need to have the right to enforce policies that are beneficial to the students.
Baby Thesis: Schools should not be able to limit students’ online speech because cyberbullying is proven to not affect most students and teachers.
The District Court recognized that the US Constitution protects free speech and expression, but at schools, free speech needs to be held to a different standard. School officials must ensure that school environments are safe and welcoming to all students (Batterton, 2011). Thus, public school administrators have a compelling interest to regulate speech that is considered student harassment and bullying. This is well established in the Student Code of Conduct that students receive each year at the beginning of the school year (Batterton, 2011). Still, Kara Kowalski argued that she was protected under the First Amendment because this did not happen at school, but it was sufficiently connected to the school environment.
Schools have become more interested in limiting students rights because cyber bullying is becoming a huge problem these days .School officials and administrators are responsible to protect their student body and maintain a safe environment. They want to make sure their students are safe and happy at school and off -grounds.They want to limit online speech so they can protect students and teachers who get cyber bullied online.
School for students should be a safe place to learn, grow, and develop into impeccable human beings. Bullying has been a major problem for years. As times have changed, and technology has taken over. Bullying has become harsher, and dangerous. Students have more ways to when it comes to bullying, with endless options. Cyberbullying in Michigan has become more of an issue over the years, leading to serious crime offenses. Since technology isn’t going anywhere, this offense will only advance. After careful review of Lamphere School District policy’s, student handbooks and Michigan state laws and policies have a great affect with the First Amendment on cyberbullying.
Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because the majority of the students are not affected by cyberbullying, making no reason for new reinforcements on the students. In document D, the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten day suspension will not be shown on their records. It must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students.
Schools are having to frequently update their codes of conduct to deal with cyberbullying circumstances that have led to lawsuits. A school can be held liable in court for something that has happened to a student due to constant cyber bullying if the issue is not resolved through some type of discipline. Schools could be sued for ignoring signs of constant cyber harassment towards a student who eventually commits suicide because of the incessant attacks. It is necessary for a school's code of conduct to embed new methods on how to deal with cyberbullying situations for current and future measures. School districts did not interfere with conflicts happening amongst students off campus until parents began to blame schools when the school did not take action to deal with the problems their children faced.
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School district was the first case to decide that students were protected under the freedom of speech when using online social media outside the school. This case is also often cited in other cases related to off-campus speech. In this case, the student used his home computer to post on his website about his principal and other teachers, using vulgar language. The principal found about the vulgar comments through another student. The principal decided to suspend the student for a total of 10 consecutive days, which resulted in the student’s grades dropping drastically, and also asked him to remove his page.
Each year, schools are having to update the Codes of Conduct in order to keep up with the bullying that is occurring on social media. Schools have failed to effectively monitor and take action upon what these students have been doing to others and what others do in return. This has resulted in many lost lawsuits, in which schools were held liable for not taking appropriate action on what occurs outside of campus. School districts therefore must take more responsibility over what happens to the students, on and off campus. Districts argue that such instances are outside of the school’s control, however these victims are still their students. In the case of Ryan Halligan, a teenage boy who committed suicide at the young age of 13, Albert D. Lawton
As the Internet has become more widely recognized and used by people all over the world, it has brought a new medium in which information can very easily be broadcast to everyone with access to it. In 1995 there was a projected 26 million Internet users, which has grown to almost 300 million today. One major problem with this is that everyone represents different countries and provinces which have different outtakes on certain types of freedom of speech as well as different laws about it. This proposes a new type of law that would need to be written in order to determine whether or not something is illegal on the Internet. A person in one country can express what they want to, but that expression may be illegal in another country and in this situation whose laws are to be followed? What I propose to do accomplish in this paper is to discuss the freedom of speech laws of the United States of America and those of France, China, and Canada. I will examine what about them is similar and what about them is different. The bringing of the Internet has brought many new types of businesses as well as ways in order to communicate with the world, but as with each new endeavor or invention, there needs to be a way in order to govern its use and policies. There must also be ways in order to punish those not following the new laws and policies of use, since that the country that the person is in may allow what they did, but it may not be allowed on the Internet or in a different country. In other words, there is the need for international laws governing the Internet.
With the click of a mouse, the press of a button, words you have written can never be taken back. Due to the advancement of technology and rise of social networking sites, ways to communicate have become so instant. Before technology was reached out to children, schoolyard bullying was more common. Now adolescents use technology to purposely and repeatedly harass, threat, or cyberbully someone just by sitting behind a computer. With the growth of technology, cyberbullying has magnified greater than ever before. The first amendment creates legal, philosophical and practical problems for parents and administrators to help prevent and take action against those who have harmed others with cyberbullying.
Internet usage in children and adolescents has been increasing in a steadily fashion in the past number of years and with the increase in internet usage, a new form of bullying has developed – Cyber bullying. Cyber bullying can be defined as “the electronic posting of mean-spirited messages about a person,” (Merriam-Webster, 2012). This form of bullying can come through various mediums including but not limited to text messages, emails, videos, and social networking sites. There is an overwhelming amount of information that defines cyber bullying, identifies the demographics of bullies and victims of cyber bullying, and identifies the outcomes of cyber bullying on victims. More focus needs to be placed on who the perpetrators of this form of violence are and how this form of violence is linked to traditional bullying. This will allow researchers and practitioners to move forward with research and implementation preventative methods and intervention once the problem has already occurred.
Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace: Government Restrictions on Content in the United States of America
The world would be a better place without you, you should go kill yourself. People often forget that there is somebody else behind the screen on the other side. The twenty-first century led to the development of several innovations, most notably the internet and social media. Despite its numerous benefits, people’s reliance on social media has spawned a new and dangerous concept called cyberbullying. Whether it is spreading rumours or sharing an inappropriate image of someone over the internet, cyberbullying is evident in this newly technology driven world. It is especially worrying when fifty percent of adolescents experience cyberbullying sometime during their lives and ten to twenty percent experience it on a regular basis
Cyberbullying is a type of bullying that takes place with the use of any electronic technology. Cyberbullying is a major problem affecting young people today. There are different types of cyberbullying. This topic comes as an interest to many people these days because bullying is very common and it can ruin a person’s life. These days, cyberbullying is considered a new form of bullying. It can happen over the internet by computer, mobile phone or any other electronic devices. Cyberbullying could involve any form of unpleasant words or pictures being displayed on the internet for others to see. It could also involve the spreading of lies about the victim on the internet. Many people are stepping up efforts to prevent bullying in the first place. Approximately half of U.S. students are impacted by traditional bullying each school day (Ross). Bullying peaks in middle school, then reduces in high school. Other types of bullying may involve the passing of notes behind someone’s back, rumors being whispered about someone, or being threatened in the internet. The most common types of cyberbullying include passing of humiliating photos, cell phone pranks, cyber stalking, impersonation, online slam books, and text wars. Bullies appear scary but truthfully they are the unhappy ones. Majority of bullies have been bullied by parents, siblings, or other young people. This may trigger them to bully and pick on other kids.