Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay about hate speech
A personal perspective of school uniform against
Debates over free speech and hate speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay about hate speech
Freedom of Speech has been long debated in our country. In two articles “Tinker v. Des Moines Case Study” and the” Here Is Why It’s Time To Get Tough On hate Speech In America” present a few very compelling points on this topic. Freedom of Speech in America has been over thought and over analyzed. Our freedom should be a loud, but such places as private businesses and schools should have guidelines, if they wish, which clearly states what is appropriate. Sometimes, people will take their authority over people way too far to the point where it becomes unethical. In 1965 the Vietnam conflict was going on which some people were not very happy about. Some teenagers decided to wear black armbands during their break to represent stopping the war. In Des Moines they school heard about this and said,” ….that any member of the student body wearing a black armband would be requested to take it off, with refusal to do so resulting in being sent home from school.”(Case Study) A couple of students wore these armbands to school and refused to take them off which resulted in their suspension, but this was done basically just because …show more content…
At the University of Iowa, a student put up some art which depicted a member of the K.K.K with newspaper articles of racism around it. This art, however, was meant to show awareness of the issue, but people saw it as pure racism. This article goes on to talk about the opposition’s point of view,” …. we need to stop permitting students from employing hate speech on school campuses and other institutes of learning.” In a sense, this should be enforced, but it needs a few modifications. This freedom we have should stay the same, but when certain public places have guidelines they should be followed with respect. The viewpoint of the opposition is, however, a little more
In the following essay, Charles R. Lawrence encompasses a number of reasons that racist speech should not be protected by the First Amendment. In this document, he exhibits his views on the subject and what he feels the society should confront these problems. In this well- written article, he provides strong evidence to prove his point and to allow the reader to see all aspects of the issue.
And even though the First Amendment grants us the freedom of speech, including such hate speech, there are limits. The federal and all state governments, including public colleges and universities and private schools that accept federal financial aid, cannot unnecessarily regulate speech, with the following exceptions: “obscenity, figh...
In recent years, a rise in verbal abuse and violence directed at people of color, lesbians, and gay men, and other historically persecuted groups has plagued the United States. Among the settings of these expressions of intolerance are college and university campuses, where bias incidents have occurred sporadically since the mid-1980's. Outrage, indignation and demands for change are the responses to these incidents - understandably, given the lack of racial and social diversity among students, faculty and administrators on most campuses. Many universities, under pressure to respond to the concerns of those who are the objects of hate, have adopted codes or olicies prhibiting speech that offends any group based on race gender, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. That's the wrong response, well-meaning or not. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects speech no matter how offensive its content.
"Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” by Derek Bok, published in Boston Globe in 1991, is an essay about what we should do when we are faced with expressions that are offensive to some people. The author discusses that although the First Amendment may protect our speech, but that does not mean it protects our speech if we use it immorally and inappropriately. The author claims that when people do things such as hanging the Confederate flag, “they would upset many fellow students and ignore the decent regard for the feelings of others” (70). The author discusses how this issue has approached Supreme Court and how the Supreme Court backs up the First Amendment and if it offends any groups, it does not affect the fact that everyone has his or her own freedom of speech. The author discusses how censorship may not be the way to go, because it might bring unwanted attention that would only make more devastating situations. The author believes the best solutions to these kind of situations would be to
A high school in Chattanooga, Tennessee suspended a student for wearing a jacket that depicted a Confederate flag. The school had already banded the flag prior to the student’s suspension, for fear of racial backlash. In a slim one-vote margin, the court upheld the school’s decision, solely for the possibility that racial retaliation could ensue. The student’s parents did appeal the decision, but the court deemed that this was not a violation of the student’s freedom of speech or expression.
Alongside diminishing harm, hate speech codes produce other benefits. Higher education institutions are the ideal forum for views to be debated using logical argument. A major portion of a student’s education is in learning how to derive and rationally support an opinion. The realm of speech that these codes target is not portrayed rationally or used to rouse discussion. In fact, hate speech is usually used to prompt
In this paper I lay out the main argument that Caroline West makes in her article “Words that Silence? Freedom of Expression and Racist Hate Speech.” West considers the minimal conditions necessary for speech to be considered free. West also considers how racist hate speech, if operating in particular ways, might undermine free speech. Her focus is on whether the moral and political benefits of racist hate speech speech outweigh the costs to racial minorities. The conclusion she reaches is that we need to weigh the benefits of one group’s ability to express racist hate speech against the costs of another group’s ability to have their views heard, understood, and considered.
While Americans may cherish their rights as afforded by the U.S. Constitution, it seems they are also sometimes willing to curtail them. This appears to be the case with certain forms of speech; more specifically when dealing with examples of hate speech. Hate speech is a form of articulation meant to harshly single out specific groups of people based upon their distinct characteristics, such as gender, race or sexual orientation, in ways that may provoke prejudicial actions or violence against them. A recent YouGov poll shows that a slight majority of respondents would support new legislation making hate speech a criminal offence (Moore). Advocates in favor of such legislation argue on the grounds that it dehumanizes specific groups, and is
With an ever changing political climate, the first amendment right of free speech has been called into question. On college campuses it is no longer a black and white when it comes to freedom of speech. Free speech can come in many forms such as protest, journalism, and social media. This raises the question: is using the right of free speech to shut down someone else’s own right unjust? The grey area lies here, where the answer is not as clear. The right to freedom of speech should not be abridged, if one believes contrarily, they themselves, are in violation of the first amendment.
At the same time, to stop the infringement upon the first amendment, no organization should place any restrictions on public or private hate speech, including the expression of hateful ideas. This is because hate speech can not be defined well enough for use in the law. One can not define the intentions of hate speech because every situation is different, and speeches may be misinterpreted in such a way that the benign ...
Hate speech has become a spotlight topic and there is a debate if free speech should protect it. The main opposition against
The First Amendment is known as the most protected civil liberty that protects our right to freedom of speech. There has been much controversy regarding hate speech and laws that prohibit it. These problems have risen from generation to generation and have been protested whether freedom of speech is guaranteed. According to our text book, By the People, hate speech is defined as “hostile statements based on someone’s personal characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.” Hate speech is a topic of issue for many people and their right’s, so the question is often proposed whether hate speech should be banned by government.
It is just as criminal to rob a man of his right to speak and hear as it would be to rob him of his money” (Douglass, 1860). In this research report, resources of academic nature such as: The First Amendment (U. S. Constitution. amend. I), Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and The First Amendment (Matsuda, 2010), and Freedom of Speech and Information Privacy (Volokh, 1999) will be used to obtain a better understanding of how the marginalization of ethnic minorities affects their ability to free speech. Additional research will be presented to address how we can help those who are affected by hate speech. In this process sources were obtained from literature, scholarly websites, and peer reviewed articles. In addition, using the “C.R.A.P.P.O” method has also helped strengthen the reliability of resources to see if they are up-to-date and from a reputable source. This investigation is eminent for those who have an interest in such topics and for those who are affected by
The Constitution of the United States of America has many aspects that we all hold dear to our hearts as Americans. More importantly the first amendment has given us all the freedoms that we as Americans live by, and in fact have died for in the past. The freedom of religion, both the establishment and exercising of religion. The freedom of speech, both in the spoken, and written, and visual expression of speech. The freedom of the press, and the right to peaceably assemble, and the right to petition the redress of government.
Throughout American history, schools have always limited students from expressing themselves. That was until the twentieth century when people started to question the ambiguity of limitations of scholars. Monumental court cases such as West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette proved that saluting the American Flag conflicted with some students’ religion. Rights and freedoms are the foundation of America and should not be severely censored within public schools. In Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 of the United States Constitution, the do...