Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Devices

996 Words2 Pages

Throughout the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Frederick Douglass uses plenty of rhetorical devices to dramatize the events of his life and reveal the truth of slavery to his readers. In one particular chapter, chapter 7, which contains an event that could be considered the turning point of Frederick Douglass’s life, Douglass fully uses his range of rhetorical ability. Although Sophia Auld’s descent into cruelty could be seen as a negative event in Douglass’s life, her actions indirectly led to the awareness of his situation through literacy, and eventually his freedom; both explained by Frederick Douglass through his analytical tone and extensive use of rhetorical devices. Frederick begins this chapter by describing the drastic …show more content…

However, once her husband, Hugh Auld, found out about her teachings, he grew angry with her, and that moment was the turning point of her disposition. In this moment, when Sophia realized she had given the “inch” to Frederick, slavery corrupted her and tore her down to the raw animalistic nature exhibited by human beings in positions of power. In fact, society accepted this warped mindset of slave owners so naturally that Frederick believed it to be “at least necessary for her to have some training in the exercise of irresponsible power” (p. 22). This understatement emphasizes the fact that corruption was so widespread that there should be some form of training for this kind of behavior to maker her qualified to be treating him in such a way. It connects her demonic transformation to the “normal behavior” of society during this time, contrasting against the morals of modern society, in which this form of cruelty towards human beings shocks audiences around the world. Extending this connection to wild animals, Frederick …show more content…

Frederick managed to get hold of a book called “The Columbian Orator”, which showed Frederick the outside perspective of slavery. Douglass explains that in this book, “the whole argument in behalf of slavery was brought forward by the master, all of which was disposed of by the slave” (p. 23). This use of antithesis places the reader in the mind of Frederick Douglass, comparing the situation of slavery and its beliefs between the slave and his master. Frederick finds the relatability between this book and his own situation by realizing the only way that he can gain freedom is through outwitting his master, and disposing of the chains that have held him back since birth. From this point forward, he had total awareness of the horrors of slavery and its immorality. He finds his literacy to now be almost a curse to him, now overly conscious, and more uncomfortable in his enslaved position. With this new information, Douglass’s need to escape increased in strength and clouded his thoughts. Douglass says that these words reach him because he often “gave tongue to interesting thoughts of [his] own soul, which had frequently flashed through [his] mind, and died away for want of utterance,” (p. 24). This personification of these thoughts highlights the deeper yearning of his soul to be free from the restraints of slavery. His

Open Document