Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australia consumer law tutorial answer
Australia consumer law tutorial answer
Australia consumer law tutorial answer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Australia consumer law tutorial answer
This essay will go through imperative elements for implementing fraudulent misrepresentation and to provide innocent party to recover civil damages, gain an injunction or other remedies from the other party. This essay will discuss imperative elements of implementing fraudulent misrepresentation, recover civil damages and gain an injunction or other remedies from the other party. Business law is very broad concept of law which covers all the legal issues that include many commercial and domestic cases which make up most of the civil cases and there are only few criminal cases where there has been serious breach of law. With the help of reference to relevant case law, this essay will argue that Bob Wheelie suffered economic loss due to fraudulent …show more content…
The best way to prove that Mr Spoke had breached section 18 is through IRAC analysis which is issue, rule, application and conclusion. The main element of section 18 is that there must be misleading or deceptive conduct which is likely to mislead or deceive which is determined by an objective test of reasonable person. The issue in this scenario is that: - Did Mr. Spoke mislead or deceive Bob by an objective? The rule is that one party must have misled or deceive other party intentionally. The application of this case is Bob bought business on the basis of historical figures which were inflated by Mr Spoke. The figures were designed by Mr Spoke in order to induce Bob to buy the business and earn extra money to use in his retirement and travel. So we can conclude that Mr Spoke fulfils all the elements which lead to breach of section 18 under Australian Consumer Law and Bob can bring a civil action. Section 18 covers broad range of misrepresentations which can be narrow down to section 29 which is for false misrepresentation as in Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR this is very similar to our scenario. A breach of section 29 can lead to fines up to $220,000 (double check this number) for individuals under s151 and person suffering damage (Bob) can recover civil damages, gain an injunction or other
Andrea may decide not to inform the limited partners about the misrepresentation of Skyline Views’s financial statements; to avoid conflict, this decision permits Ed to deceive the company and limited partners. In addition, by deciding not to inform the limited partners of Ed’s deceit, Andrea would be disregarding the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct in her being unreliable, dishonest and deceitful. Andrea has the responsibility of protecting her client, which involves encouraging the correction of financial statements in order to prevent suspicion during audits that could lead to fines and imprisonment. Andrea’s second option is to inform the limited partners about how misrepresentations of Skyline Views’s financial statements are permitting Ed to claim a higher management fee; this decision will fulfill her due diligence obligation to the limited partners while maintaining her integrity as a certified public accountant in supporting the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct.
Question Presented: Petitioner Giridar C. Sekhar was convicted of extortion under the federal law for potentially exposing an extramarital affair unless the general counsel for the state comptroller recommended that the state pension fund invest in a fund managed by Sekhar’s company. The meaning of the word “property” would be determined by the courts under the federal extortion law. They would also decide whether the General Counsel had recommended the “property” and if it could be subject to extortion by the federal law. The petitioner had argued for a narrow of the meaning or definition of the word “Property”. He wished that it were brought to the meaning of something that is of value and that is transferable.
-Court must be convinced that failure to comply with an agreement will lead to one of the parties to suffer prejudice. Court will protect innocent party, will provide remedy
A party is deceived or misinform into dealing with the corporation rather than the individual.
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156
A fraud is a wrong action, which is basically deprivation of the legal rights from an individual. Fraud is seen at various instances of life. There are a number of frauds that occur and every case has different rights being deprived from an individual. When frauds take place, some legal authority has to intervene and take the necessary action. The legal authority is granted with the power to decide the right that has been taken from the victim and identify the compensation to be given to the individual on behalf of the party, which has made the fraud. In this report, I will discuss some cases in which fraud caused some issues and deprivation of the basic legal rights of an individual thus resulting in
The term “fraud” is commonly used to describe the use of deception to deprive, disadvantage or cause loss to another person or party. This can include theft, the misuse of funds or other resources, or more complicated crimes such as false accounting and the supply of false information. This case study of Mountain State Sporting Goods is an excellent example of individuals acting on the opportunity to financial benefit by committing what they thought was harmless adjustments, but in reality was fraud. In this case study there are is just so much wrong with this company and how it operates. We noticed multiple areas of concern before even seeing the financial statements and my concerns were confirmed upon further investigation.
The Phar-Mor case again involves a retail enterprise, inventory overstatements, and both fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets. The auditors completely failed to discover the fraud, missing the many warning signs and ignoring the high-risk elements of the engagement. Yet again, the scrupulous, yet dedicated, fraudsters showed that they were capable of fooling everyone for an extended period of time. Until recent years, remained one of the largest US corporate frauds of all time.
I have gotten a better understanding of ethical, moral, and legal problems faced by many businesses’, after reading Chapter 2 Understanding Ethical and Legal Considerations of the text Technical Communication (9th ed.) by Mike Markel,.
Hanson, J. R. (n.d.). Fraud or confusion? RDH Magazine, 19(4). Retrieved 3 15, 2014, from http://www.rdhmag.com/articles/print/volume-19/issue-4/feature/fraud-or-confusion.html
...useless car to a junk yard to recover some loss, but the difference of the re-sale of the junk-car would be a significant loss. Though there were no adequate assurances to the contract, anticipatory repudiation is the only probable remedy for Jack. However, the outcome would weigh on the predominant factor test, which is met because Tom is covered as a merchant because he is operating in his usual daily business, and Jack is the buyer. The sole purpose of the contract was for Tom to sell Jack a car, and for Jack to buy a car from Tom. The UCC, though less stringent than the statute of frauds, does effectively regulate commercial transfers allowing the free market to operate without diminishing the integrity of trade.
With a claim-making framework, repetition, testability, and logical open discourse is accessible. Having a civil rights perspective and utilizing sociological principles are needed for a good claim, and a good one can be quite defensible. A critical eye is essential in the process of claim-making. There are three elements of making claims. The elements are justice, evidence, and process. The elements and their relationship to each other are complex. Furthermore, there are three types of justice
Describe Wrongful Interference with a Business Relationship. Provide the Pros and Cons Dependencies of That Business Relationship.
“It is always right to detect a fraud and to perceive a folly; but it is very often wrong to expose either. A man of business should always have his eyes open, but must often seem to have them shut.” (Stanhope).
Misrepresentation refers to a circumstance where a person is induced to enter into a contract partly or entirely by untrue information made by the other party. Misrepresentation can lead to a contract to be voidable. Voidable contract means there is a valid contract whether is written or verbal. In any voidable contracts, a party has a choice whether to rescind or to continue with the contract. However, there are certain circumstances and elements of misrepresentation that can cause a contract to be voidable. Misrepresentation can occur in a number of ways. Under Section 18 of the Contract Act 1950, misrepresentation includes:-