Franz Kafka The Trial Analysis

789 Words2 Pages

In the novel “The Trial” written by Franz Kafka, a character named Josef K. was suddenly arrested the morning of his 30th birthday. K. was given no explanation of his arrest. He was allowed to resume his daily life but is told to attend court hearings every Sunday. Josef spends a year under trial. Throughout his trial, Josef K. seeks guidance from his lawyer and everyone that has some knowledge of his trial but is only given advice in which K. thought to be useless. Not being able to understand the kind of legal system he was dealing with, k. never understood what he was guilty of. He then dies on his 31st birthday. This novel illustrates the senses of religion as it becomes one of the forces that influence the outcome of Josef K.’s existence. Josef K. interprets the legal system as just a legal system that is unfairly accusing him and not as a religious system that is accusing him of his sin of a human being.
Religious belief is one of the forces that influence the outcome of our existence. In this novel, the legal system is, in a sense, metaphorically a religious belief in which is responsible for judging a person’s life as a whole. Josef’s life is being judged by god. The mind of god is correct, it may not make sense to us but we must have faith. Josef K.’s inability to understand the legal system’s judgment through religious means makes it hard for him to comprehend what he was being accused of. The legal system didn’t seek Josef k. to make him admit being guilty for unlawful actions but to make him confront his own humanity, to admit his basic guilt as a human being whereas in religious means “The Original Sin”. K. doesn’t accept his basic guilt as a human being because he doesn’t see the system as a force of religious means...

... middle of paper ...

... see Huld. K. tells Huld that he was being dismissed because he sees no progression in his case. Huld replies “…From a certain point onward in one’s practice… nothing really new ever happens” (pg187) K. didn’t put much thought into what Huld said. If K. took the time to study what Huld said, he could have looked at his case from a different point of view such as a religious context. Huld then summons block in to show K. how others were being treated in hopes that he’ll draw a lesson from it. Huld doesn’t tell Block any information about how his trial was going yet block treats him with the upmost respect and dog-like behavior in such praise worthy sense. This shows the lawyer that block has faith in him. Block’s actions towards Huld shows hope in a religious way. He has no clue on what is going on in his case but has hope that Huld will give him some sort of answer.

Open Document