Frankenstein's Creature Is A Victim Not A Villain
In this essay I aim to discuss the statement "Frankenstein's creature
is a victim not a villain"
In 1814 Mary Wollestonecraft met Percy shelly, a poet and writer. They
ran away together, to escape Mary's family and Percy's pregnant wife,
Harriet. Harriet drowned herself and Mary and percy were married two
weeks later. "Frankenstein" was started in 1816 and finally published
in 1818.
From 1815 to 1819 three of mary Shelly's four children died in
infancy, these series of deaths may have encouraged shelly to continue
writing "Frankenstein".
Shelly was good friends with Lord Byron, a famous romantic poet. Along
with her husband, he influenced shelly while she was writing the book.
Around the same time scientists were investigating the idea of
bringing dead bodies to life using mainly electricity as a source of
power. This being a new idea and quite big news at the time, this must
have been a basis for "Frankenstein".
Frankenstein spent years in the creation of his creature. However as
soon as he laid eyes upon its living form he rejected him. The
creature tries at first to make contact with him, but Frankenstein may
have thought that the creature was trying to attack him and escapes
from the creature. The novel is set at a time when people believed
that beautiful things were divine and that ugly things were evil. This
may explain why Frankenstein was so afraid of the creature.
Frankenstein's first comment about the creature is describing it as a
"catastrophe". this shows that he was appalled by his creature as soon
as he was animated. Going on, Frankenstein feels that what he has done
is totally wrong and starts regretting what he has done more ...
... middle of paper ...
...r the monster. If the creature was a victim not a
villain, then he would not have gone through with this murder,
especially on an innocent victim. If he was truly out for revenge then
he would probably have killed Frankenstein and not just tried to make
him miserable by killing those around him.
In conclusion, I feel that Frankenstein's creature is a victim rather
than a villain. This is my opinion after reviewing the evidence
against him being a victim and against him being a villain. I feel
that the evidence for him being a victim of neglect, misunderstanding
and prejudice outweighs that for him being evil minded.
However, this essay has offered another question in my mind; we as
humans have the power to take life, but could we go against the "laws
of God", and really try to give life instead? In my opinion, this
would be our greatest achievement.
Another aspect that caught my attention was the simply idea that could change the direction of a country. It is undisputed that when someone has an idea, the only way to see it is simply atreviendoce realizer to carry it out. In this case, the governor of New York State Ell was quie he promoted the construction of this canal.
save the lives they did. The history of this technology begins with a theory by James Clerk
allowed it to last over 200 years. To sit and read through all of the
Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley and is a gothic horror. It is an important book because it tells us about when scientists and doctors started to experiment with bringing back the dead. I will look at arguments for both sides of the question. This is an important question because there is a strong argument for both sides and in a lot of modern films about him he is portrayed as a villain who like nothing more than killing and lightening.
Society is inevitable. It will always be there as a pleasure and a burden. Society puts labels on everything such as good or bad, rich or poor, normal or aberrant. Although some of these stamps are accurate, most are misconceptions. In Mary Shelley's, Frankenstein, this act of erring by society is extremely evident. Two of the most inaccurate assumptions of society revolve around the central characters, Dr. Frankenstein and the monster. Society's labels for these two extremely different characters are on the exact opposite side of the scale of what they truly are. Dr. Frankenstein is more of a monster while the monster is more humane.
and how he envisioned it, was condemned by the media and the public by doing so.
In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the Creature's only need is for a female companion, which he asks Victor Frankenstein his maker to create. Shelley shows the argument between the creature and Frankenstein. The creature says: "I demand a creature of another sex, but as hideous as myself " (Shelley 139). Shelley shows what the creature wants from Frankenstein and what his needs are. Shelley gives us an idea of the sympathy that Frankenstein might feel for the creature even though he neglects him. The creature confronts Victor demanding his attention and expressing his needs. I feel a lot of sympathy for the creature based on him being able to forgive Victor for abandoning him and being able to communicate with him.
While scientists pursuing the progress of science today, it would be good if they do it for the benefits of human race. However, if their desires for scientific discovery are caused by their selfish ambition, and they do not take responsibility of them if fail, their creations might become threats for human. As an example of Frankenstein, written by the English author Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, tells the story of a young science Victor Frankenstein who creates a grotesque creature in a scientific experiment, and that cause the tragedy for the rest of his life and the death of many innocent people. When people read this book, many of them might see the creature as a monster as the fact that it has a horrible
The Americans needed to come up with another system. Henry Knox was gave the task to come up wit...
The literary critic Harold Bloom, in his Afterward in the Signet Edition of Frankenstein states that, “The monster is at once more intellectual and more emotional than his creator.” Bloom continues to say that the creature is more human, more lovable, and more to be pitied than Doctor Frankenstein (292). Throughout the novel Frankenstein, the monster portrays more human qualities than his creator Dr. Frankenstein. Dr. Frankenstein appears less human than his creation because he rejects his own creation and he fails to plan for the results of his experiment. As the monster wanders through the novel searching for companionship and acceptance, Dr. Frankenstein refuses to provide the support expected of a parent or creator. While the monster appears human in his attempts to socialize with his peers, Dr. Frankenstein represents the monstrosity that occurs when humans tamper with life.
At first glance, the monster in Frankenstein is a symbol of evil, whose only desire is to ruin lives. He has been called "A creature that wreaks havoc by destroying innocent lives often without remorse. He can be viewed as the antagonist, the element Victor must overcome to restore balance and tranquility to the world." But after the novel is looked at on different levels, one becomes aware that the creature wasn't responsible for his actions, and was just a victim of circumstance. The real villain of Frankenstein isn't the creature, but rather his creator, Victor.
In the novel Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley the motif of cruelty functions as a motive and mode of retaliation. Both Victor and the Creature portray the roles of the perpetrator and victim of cruelty as seen through the rejection the Creature receives from the humans, Victor’s betrayal to the Creature, and the revenge sought out by the Creature.
When Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein is analyzed, critics comes to a conclusion about Victor Frankenstein's creation. The creature invokes the most sympathy from the readers than any other character in the novel. Because he is abandoned by society which manipulates the creature to do evil things despite his good heart. Therefore Shelley's message throughout the novel is that a person is not born evil, they are made evil.
investors and businessmen to work harder, his thinking was to make the people gain a better
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or; The Modern Prometheus, published in 1818, is a product of its time. Written in a world of social, political, scientific and economic upheaval it highlights human desire to uncover the scientific secrets of our universe, yet also confirms the importance of emotions and individual relationships that define us as human, in contrast to the monstrous. Here we question what is meant by the terms ‘human’ and ‘monstrous’ as defined by the novel. Yet to fully understand how Frankenstein defines these terms we must look to the etymology of them. The novel however, defines the terms through its main characters, through the themes of language, nature versus nurture, forbidden knowledge, and the doppelganger motif. Shelley also shows us, in Frankenstein, that although juxtaposing terms, the monstrous being everything human is not, they are also intertwined, in that you can not have one without the other. There is also an overwhelming desire to know the monstrous, if only temporarily and this calls into question the influence the monstrous has on the human definition.