Francis Dolarhyde: The Great Red Dragon

1379 Words3 Pages

“You are looking but you are not seeing” (Ratner, 2002, Min. 45). Fictional character Hannibal Lector was quoted as saying. Yet no other phrase fits as well when we look into the curious case of Francis Dolarhyde. Due to the fact that he appears entirely normal, but his other side is anything but. In a sense he was a serial killer who murdered entire families by shooting them in their beds. Then begins to live out his fantasy of “family “and fulfills his commitments to his alter ego the “The Great Red Dragon.” We are merely scratching the surface of this interesting and complex individual. Let’s take a deeper dive of who he was and what made him to what he turned out to be. Part I covering his history. Part II covering his crimes in detail. …show more content…

Of his two crimes committed after deciding on family. He would kill the family pet exactly three days before a full moon then sleep in their backyard, hiding in the day until the event. On the night on full moons he would break in. (Knowing layout due to home movie knowledge). Shooting each of them in the head as they sleep, then smashing all mirrors taking shards and placing them into optical sockets of victims. Following that he would drag any and all corpses into master bedroom where he would have necrophilic pleasures with mother’s corpse. With orgasmic culmination leading to bites on victim’s body. Ritualistically incorporating a dragon persona during killings and having an “audience” during said “transformation.” He would repeat this process after finding another family home movie and deciding upon it. Then begins to wait patiently until next full moon cycle to begin …show more content…

Let’s debunk this as it would be DID as quoted as “person also experiences memory loss that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness.” (Dissociative Identity Disorder, n.d. para. 2). Yet, he suffered no memory loss what so ever. He knew what he was doing the whole time and not questioning “what happened night before?” Bargaining with his “dragon persona” as not to kill or harm Reba because she is nice. Reasoning the dragon’s presence and trying to “stop it.” DID sufferers cannot attach or understand their other personality. But Francis identifies with the dragon and lives with it, so it is not DID. Wait, why not bi-polarism if its not DID? Well although striking similar in diagnosis. DSM-5 as well as recorded in Healthline (article being on Is it Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia?). Is that presence of delusions. Where bipolar would not. Yet, there were no manic or hypomanic episodes recorded in Francis’s lifetime. He was not in a stupor depression for an extended amount of time and could function enough to have job. Where bipolar could not. I.e. is work was not interrupted by the schizophrenia where as bipolar

Open Document