Four Types Of Triangulation

1391 Words3 Pages

3.3.2 Triangulation
Triangulation is "the combination of methodologies in the study of the same phenomena" (Denzin 291). Triangulation is also defined as "a process by which the researcher can guard against the accusation that a study 's findings are simply an artifact of a single method, a single source, or a single investigator 's biases" (Patton 1197). There are different types of triangulation. Patton differentiates between four types: a) methods triangulations; b) triangulation of sources; c) analyst triangulation; and d) perceptive triangulation (1993). Triangulation can be used not only in qualitative research, but also in quantitative research. Bamberger states that: ".. triangulation is also used in quantitative research, usually …show more content…

By involving referees, a researcher candidate can get a clear understanding about the items used as well as the validity of such items to the content of the research conducted. In this study, the researcher sent his questionnaire to some PhDs holders in the field of applied linguistics and English language teaching (ELT) to get highly valid and reliable data. At the first step, the researcher discussed the questionnaire items with some PhD candidates in the field of ELT. Then, after that discussion, the researcher sent the questionnaire items to Dr. Paul John Kurf, Ph.D., Academic Specialist, Michigan State University, UAS. Dr. Paul sent back the questionnaire with some comments and suggestions, which the research took into account and modifying the draft of the questionnaire. The researcher then sent the questionnaire to Dr. Reza Mobashshernia who holds PhD in Applied Linguistics and is employed by English Department, at Islamic Azad University, in Chaloos, IRAN). He is one of the Iranian PhD experts in the field of Applied linguistics. Dr. Mobashshernia was asked to check the content validity of the items as they related to the research questions. The researcher 's items designs got a high score of validity from Dr. Mobashshernia, that is, a score of 96%. The data related to that score is included in the appendix. The researcher also sent the …show more content…

The final step of refereeing the questionnaire is that it has been sent to four of the famous professors of English language lecturing at Aden University of Yemen. Those professors are asked to check the clarity and ease of use the terms to be used by the researcher to the sample. All the professors are native speakers of Arabic and perfectly aware of the performance of the study sample. After that the questionnaire was sent to my supervisor, Dr. S.S. Kanade to check the validity and reliability of my items because he is the most familiar with my topic , as he is working with me from the beginning and got good understanding of my topic. Finally, as soon as I got the agreement from my supervisor to pilot the questionnaire item, I tried out my

Open Document