Fossils Evidence For Evolution Essay

1. Fossils are commonly thought to be the “evidence for evolution” but there is so much more. Use examples to illustrate one of these other lines of evidence, being explicit in how it relates to the tree-like branching pattern of evolution. The molecular record is another line of evidence for evolution. Molecular records show a stronger evidence for evolution by comparing the DNA of different species. Even though fossils that are similar gives a physical relation to another, species DNA show more similarities. For example humans and chimpanzees are similar in appearance, structure but are more closely related by DNA. Humans are Primates right along with the great apes, one of the main individuals of the primate evolutionary tree. The Smithsonian

What would you want to know to evaluate whether Reaves is right “these snakes have now started to evolve to the point they’re losing their rattle in order to survive”, and how would you go about finding out? In order to determine whether Reaves is right I would look into the different types of rattle snakes being found in the areas where the claims are coming from doing this will give me a view of the range of rattle snakes that live in the areas. I would also look at the time gaps of before the rattle snakes started going silent to the present to see if there is a difference in population size. If Reaves is right I would expect a lower population rate for rattle snakes that do rattle verse those that don’t rattle as much. I would also want to know what is influencing the rattlesnake gene pool. Something has to be the cause for why rattle snakes would to go silent. A predator would more than likely be the cause for why rattle snakes are going silent allowing them not to alert their predators or prey. Those that are heritably prone to staying quiet would be the rattlesnakes that are more likely to pass on their genes, causing a population of quiet rattlesnakes to form. Leaving us with the conclusion that rattlesnakes are