Foreshadow My Own Beaux Arts By W. H. Auden

1713 Words4 Pages

. . . [H]ow everything turns away
Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may
Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,
But for him it was not an important failure (Lines 14-17).
As exemplified by these lines from the poem “Musée des Beaux Arts” by W. H. Auden, one of the shortcomings of the human condition is the difficulty in noticing the suffering of others when it does not concern oneself. Occasionally, a particular issue may become a cause célèbre, encouraging people to look outside themselves and thereby inciting much compassion and beneficial change. While cause célèbres do bring about positive impacts, such impacts are often trivial. Furthermore, cause célèbres may draw attention away from far more significant issues. This …show more content…

In the first two stanzas, the idea of quietness is mentioned four times. In the first stanza, moments of silence are the result of various disturbances in nature, likely referring to the tragedy of the child’s death; for example, “all humbling darkness / Tells with silence the last light breaking” (Lines 3-4). The fact that the darkness that silently foreshadows the end of light is “all humbling” (Line 3) demonstrates that tragic events make people realize the transient status of the peaceful status quo they have established. Afterwards, there is a “still hour / . . . come out of the sea tumbling in darkness” (Lines 5-6), which likely stands for the time of announcement of the child’s death. The contrast between the two elements of natural disturbances and silence highlights the nature of tragic events: they disrupt the previous order in such a way that the world itself seems to stop, hence the coming of the “still hour” (Line 5). Later, in the second stanza, the speaker mourns at “the synagogue of the ear of corn” (Line 9). He then asks if he “[s]hall . . . let pray the shadow of a sound” (Line 10). Clearly, the idea of quietness is associated with mourning in the second stanza. One of the two places the speaker enters to mourn is the “synagogue of the ear of corn” (Line 9), which is rather paradoxical because there is no such synagogue and the “ear of corn” (Line 9) is …show more content…

Clearly, the speaker is not truly asking whether or not he should mourn quietly - he wants to point out the inefficacy of grieving the child’s death. This is further supported by the speaker’s use of descriptions such as “salt seed” (Line 11) and “least valley of sackcloth” (Line 12). Both descriptions deride a place of mourning - the “Zion of the water bead” (Line 8) - as being infertile, thereby demonstrating that the practice of mourning itself results in nothing. Another interesting description in this sentence is the use of the word “majesty” (Line 13) to describe the “burning of the child’s death” (Line 13). While there is a certain, albeit macabre, grandeur to the fire that results from an air raid, majesty has far too positive connotations for such a horrific tragedy. Therefore, its use is for the purpose of further emphasizing the pointlessness of grieving, as it is obviously pointless to grieve a majestic occurrence. Finally, in the last instance of skillful wordplay, the speaker states that he will not “murder / the mankind of her [the child] going with a grave truth” (Lines 14-15). The word “grave” (Line 15) hearkens back to both the child’s death and the word murder. Interestingly, “grave” (Line 15) is used to describe the word truth. However, as a truth cannot literally murder a person,

Open Document