Forensic Evidence In The Poisoner's Handbook By Deborah Blum

964 Words2 Pages

Remedies that were once used to treat diseases and utilities that could be used to build a house were starting to be turned into deadly, easily accessed, weapons. Prior to the 1920’s, murderers who killed using poison could get away with the death being ruled “by natural causes”, but after, skilled toxicologists re-innovated the procedures medical examiners perform when ruling a cause of death. After technology has advanced, killers who picked their poison (literally) were not able to get away with it as easily. An average person may think it’s more difficult to track down a lethal poisoner, let alone rule the cause of death a poisoning; however, it’s just like any other homicide.
A way to gather enough evidence without necessarily tracing the poison, but just like any other crime scene, there is forensic evidence left behind. In certain situations, if investigators are trying to prove that a person is the murderer, they would search the accused’s home. In other situations, detectives only …show more content…

Examples of forensic evidence that would be found in a poison-oriented crime scene include (but are not limited to): footprints, fingerprints, and other sources of DNA. In The Poisoner’s Handbook by Deborah Blum, a case

More about Forensic Evidence In The Poisoner's Handbook By Deborah Blum

Open Document