Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons for foreign aid
Persuasive Writing Tecniques
Technics in persuasive writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons for foreign aid
Economics lecturer Chris Hey wrote a piece for a Melbourne newspaper on the idea of a foreign aid tax, arguing that Australia could do more to assist developing countries by expecting all Australians to contribute. His argument is a very strong case for more action and uses persuasive language to get the point across effectively. Hey immediately argues that the aid tax is a good idea and criticises governments for not doing enough, aiming to have readers thinking that more action is needed. The headline poses a direct question to readers and encourages them to consider what it is that the author might want them to help with. This is designed to encourage the audience to read on to find out more. Hey then tells the audience in the first paragraph …show more content…
He says it would be done in a ‘fiscally responsible’ way, which makes it sound like a careful approach so people don’t worry about losing lots of money. The focus on the means testing achieves the same result. When he says that rich people would be ‘giving a little back’ he makes it sound like the overall contributions are really small and nothing to worry about. He also then confronts readers with the ‘moral’ arguments, and poses questions to challenge readers. The repetition of ‘How can we justify’, ‘How can we do nothing …’ makes readers think there is no other choice and urges them to act. This is basically a guilt trip but it’s effective because it’s more emotive than the section that uses just dry statistics. Furthermore, using Bono from U2 makes people realise that this is a big issue and that if pop stars are involved then we all should be making an effort. He closes this section by focusing again on self-interest, arguing that lots more jobs could be created. He says that ‘hundreds’ of people already rely on this industry and ‘imagine’ what we could achieve if we donated more – this makes people feel optimistic about the benefits of action rather than focusing on
...ould be given away” (Singer, Peter). He did not give enough reasoning in why we should donate and why he is requesting such a large portion of one’s salary. He then goes on and says, “If we value the life of a child more than going to fancy restaurants, the next time we dine out we will know that we could have done something better with our money” (Singer, Peter).
Which leads into my third and final premise, changing the date will be a large step towards reconciliation and act as a demonstration that we have aspirations to make our country better. Many people claim that changing the date will not change history. Of course they’re right because nothing can change history. If we were capable of doing so, I’d like to think we would have done it already. Changing the date of Australia Day will not reverse the suffering that the original custodians of this land were subjected to. Nor will it abolish the iron fist of racism that Australia seems to be gripped by.
In other words, Singer believes that unless you can find something wrong with the following argument, you will have to drastically change your lifestyle and how you spend your money. Although some people might believe that his conclusion is too radical, Singer insists that it is the logical result of his argument. In sum, his view is that all affluent people should give much more to famine relief. While I agree with Singer’s argument in principle, I have a problem with his conclusion. In my view, the conclusion that Singer espouses is underdeveloped.
... aid across the world. As we have established that we do have an obligation to redistribute globally in a cosmopolitan perspective, distributing wealth however we may need to rethink what the best assistance is. Amaryta Sen conveys that before sending aid to the third world state, we would need to fully understand the limitation of freedom in the country. Redistributing wealth to global countries requires it to be evaluated by the economic shortage that they are suffering and to see whether it will be efficient in the long run. The more effective ways to contribute would be to international relief agencies or NGO’s that would pursue international development projects to help those in poverty or the alternative option by Tom Campbell’s idea of a ‘Global humanitarian levy’ which suggests a more appropriate taxation on all citizens to collectively aid those in need.
Those who argue in favor of foreign aid say that it is an investment in the
To conclude, the text uses many persuasive features and devices to effectively persuade people. For example, pronouns are used to directly address the reader and make them feel involved, and facts and statistics are used, which prove the charity and backs up the opinion strongly. Celebrity backing from Bono is also used, this may make people listen and respect the charity and Bono’s fans may also support the charity. Presentational devices are also used in aid of persuading the reader e.g. the picture of the pants, this provides humour and makes the reader want to read the article to find out why the pants are relevant. Therefore, the ‘Make Poverty History’ text is effective; this is because of the above reasons and makes the reader want to help abolish poverty.
If you are an immigrant or just want to live in one of the best counties in the world illegally, with no penalty if you get caught come to Americana. They will welcome you with open aims Just like (Fred Reed) – said in “Why Blame Mexico” (we say to impoverished Mexicans, “See this river? Don’t cross it. If you do, we’ll give you good jobs, driver’s licenses, citizenship for your kids born here, school for said kids, public assistance, governmental documents in Spanish for your convenience, and a much better future. There is no penalty for getting caught. Now, don’t cross this river, hear?” How smart is that? We’re baiting them. It’s like putting out a salt lick and then complaining when deer come. Immigrant parents would be irresponsible not
Each year the RMHC of Chicagoland awards $4,000 per year, that is renewable scholarships to extraordinary area high school seniors who are committed to community service and academic excellence.
Stephanie Medley-Rath breaks down an important issue when it comes to schools and fundraising. She makes a very valid point that school fundraisers can be expensive for most people depending on the community that you live in. Every year the school her kids go to have a fundraiser and she has to choose to either go ahead and sell the products or she just donates some money to the school. The town she resides in is considered to be a community of lower income status and only a few that are consider middle class. When fundraising, a school can choose a percentage of return in sales. Stephanie figures that if the school chooses to go with a 25% of sales and for example one person buys five boxes of chocolates for five dollars the total is $25.00 the school would earn $ 6.25. If the school chooses a 30% return and using the same scenario but the price of the chocolates would cost $ 7.00 a box, the total being $ 35.00, the school would earn $ 10.50. She examines the amount made by the majority of the community and figures that most of them cannot afford or would not want to spend $ 7.00 for a box of chocolates. She explains how she thought this was her own private issue but it is now becoming more of a public issue for her community by not being able to sell that price of chocolate to anyone.
As a mother, the first thing that came to my mind were children, when we were informed to choose a nonprofit organization as a topic for the persuasive speech. I don’t have any prior experience helping an organization, so I went on a detailed research. In doing so, I have learned that of all 6 charity checker websites that our good professor has listed on blackboard, 4 of them have only good reports about my chosen nonprofit organization, Save the Children. First, Guidestar rated it gold. Second, Great Nonprofits rated it four and a half stars. Third, Charity Navigator rated it 4 stars. Lastly, Charity Watch rated it A, which means excellent. As for Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance, it says that Save the Children is
Another weakness of Singer’s article is the aggressive language he uses throughout his piece of writing to influence the reader. For example, his use of forceful dialogue encourages people to give money in this following statement, Telling the reader what to do is not an effective way to convince an audience to make a contribution.
In his article, the author Peter Singer presents valid points within his work in a way that provokes one to question their morals and ethics. He rationalizes the gift of donation in an unconventional but motivating manor. The purpose of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to encourage people to reevaluate his or her ability to contribute to the underprivileged people of the world. Singer is addressing this article to any person with the ability to donate. The author makes it clear that nearly everyone has the ability to make a difference is others lives. Additionally, in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author explain that we have a duty to give, but he is not stating whether it is a duty of justice in Narveson’s sense. He is not stating if would be morally correct for anyone to force us or impose to us to give to the needy. This author is trying to persuade or convince people to give voluntarily. The author is not enforcing to do something, this is contrary to Narveson’s position “enforced fee”. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” addresses the urgency for a more generous world. Peter Singer presents valid points within his work in a way that provokes one to question their morals and ethics. He rationalizes the gift of donation in an unconventional but motivating manor. The main purpose of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to
Gurría, Angel. "Improve tax fairness and help the developing world." OCED. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 24/04/2009. Web. 9 Oct 2011. .
Main Point: and what our community could look like if we all did our part.
... of Americas health care. I had to use my summary to help communicate the view that the radio show was trying to get across. When I stated, “The harsh reality of this Trends With Benefits radio program is that 14 million jobless Americans are accepting to live in poverty, with an income of only $13,000. Joffe-Walt ends knowing that as a result of these Americans being on disability, many will end up being poor for the rest of their lives.” I did get slightly off topic and did not successfully communicate the point.