Foissart Chronicles Analysis

999 Words2 Pages

Froissart’s Chronicles, simply known as the Chroniques, is considered by historians as the one of the important entities that recounts the events which happened during the Hundred Years’ War period. It was an extensive literary work with approximately 1.5 million words in length, written in Middle French prose by Jean Froissart. The Chronicles start by narrating the deposition of King Edward II in year 1326 and covering events from this time onward up to year 1400, hence can be significant in the study of the first part of the Hundred Years’ War. This source is also of vital importance in the study as well as the understanding of the chivalric culture of the 14th century England and French as chivalry and knighthood are the central ideal of …show more content…

Froissart’s legacy includes Meliador, an Arthurian romance and a large amount of poetry works. However, his Chronicles is the most renowned work of all. Due to his chivalric expressions in the Chronicles, he is often labelled as the “Chronicler of Chivalry”. Froissart lived around the period of 1337 to 1405 and can be considered as a cleric that comes from a middle class background of that time. He once served under Phillippa of Hainault the queen consort of Edward III of England and wrote a rhyming chronicles known as the “lost chronicle” for her. After the death of Queen …show more content…

For example, when Froissart attempted to describe the severity and mortality of the plague known as the Black Death, he wrote that ‘People died suddenly and at least a third of all the people in the world died then.’ This can be regarded as the author’s own assumption and there are no statistical reliability to his claim. However, it is also interesting to note that even though Froissart tends to neglect the life of commoner and peasants in his own writing (as his work generally central around the idea of chivalry and aristocratic belief of the Middle Ages), he has included some descriptions of the reactions of the people during that time of Black Death in order to ward off the plague to make his writing relevant and interesting for the readers. For instance, he has written that: “They were men who did public penance and scourged themselves with whips of hard knotted leather with little iron spikes. Some made themselves bleed very badly between the shoulders and some foolish women had cloths ready to catch the blood and smear it on their eyes, saying that it was miraculous blood.” In conclusion, although Froissart Chronicles is written based on the historical events that occurred during the Hundred Years’ War period, the reports of these events can be erroneous and inaccurate, which is a main characteristic of medieval historical writing. Hence, historians must view

Open Document