Distinguishing Fissures in Shuaiba through Well Data Analysis

1136 Words3 Pages

Clastic zone. Fissure. The main parameters for distinguishing fissure is THL and GVR images by well. As it discussed previously the cut off for fissure is less than 20ft, based on well data. Secondary distinctive parameter is resistivity image, the fissure does not have a structure, and mainly it is perpendicular to wellbore and has a rugged surface, usually conductive. According the observations fissures can be filled with sand or clay, and mixed. The figures #39 and #40 shows the distance from surface of shaly and sandy fissures. As you see from the figures, there is no difference between clean sand and shaly sand fissures in distance to top Shuaiba surface. The main message that fissures are mostly sand filled, that might create a high permeability zones in Shuaiba. Figure #14 shows the non-scaled distribution along the wellbore fissures, based on well data the average THL of fissure 8ft, and thickness around 80ft, which means the distribution of clastic zones in Shu9A. There is an one evidence when fissure with a high permeability, based on …show more content…

The pressure pre-test at 10,851 ft. MDRT is in a sand filled fissure which also had depletion and fits with the depletion profile observed along the well indicating possible communication between the Shuaiba and Nahr …show more content…

And there is no doubt that feature detected in the Shuaiba the well trajectory confirms. According the dimensions iron rich zones considered as a fissures, on GVR images structurally also crossing Shuaiba perpendicular, but all of them conductive, looks like due to heavy mineral content. On the Figure #18 shown distribution of iron rich zones and it is clearly seen that most of iron rich intervals are correlates with fault. Taking that observation in consideration was presented 2 concepts of origin of the iron rich

More about Distinguishing Fissures in Shuaiba through Well Data Analysis

Open Document