Film Analysis: Jiro Dreams Of Sushi

934 Words2 Pages

Jiro Dreams of Sushi is a documentary filmed in 2011 and directed by David Gelb and follows and 85 year old sushi master Jiro Ono the new of a three star restraint. Jiro is on a quest for perfecting the art of sushi and takes us on the journey of how this has been his pursuit for almost his whole life. The film also features his two sons who are both sushi chefs too. However lets take an in-depth look at this documentary and look at not only the story but also the technical aspects of what made up this documentary. Lets look at the cinematography, sound, lighting, and editing. Cinematography: In Jiro Dreams of Sushi the cinematographer David Gelb used a verity of different framing, angles and certain components, shots, scenes and sequences …show more content…

In an article in The View Finder, they write “The cinematography is absolutely gorgeous! It mimics Jiro’s style in its artistry, his skills in its pacing, and his philosophy in its purity.” The cinematography was beautiful and enticing. There is also a backstory of how Jiro grew up and had his own family, this is show through a sequence broken up over the documentary. The back story is important because it tells the viewer more about who Jiro is today and how he came to be the person he is …show more content…

Sound: The sound used in the documentary was both wonderful when it came to music and shocking when it came to audio at times. The music was placed so beautifully and lead the emotions of the viewer exactly to the point were the director wanted. The sound design was wonderful too, how so many scenes felt isolated and intimate due to the “natural sound” in the room. An example would be when Jiro’s son is beating seaweed paper agains the stone the viewer begins to feel his frustration. However the audio for the interviews was not the best and often felt like onboard sound was used during interviews. It became distorted and jarring at times which really interfered with the tone and mood of the documentary. Overall the sound design was good however at times during the interviews it was quite distracting and felt like proper mic’s were not part of the set up. Lighting: Overall the documentary was lit very well, external light were definitely used for the interviews because the backgrounds and the subject was evenly lit. Three point lighting was used during the interviews, a key light, fill light and back light. Interesting in the lighting during the interviews was that the restraints lights were used for the back light, which gave many of the interviews a warm

Open Document