Fidel: The Untold Story

894 Words2 Pages

The two documentaries that we watched in class showed different sides of Fidel Castro. There were overlaps that conveyed who Fidel Castro is really is. In The Last Communist documtary, Castro is portrayed as powerful, danger, and irresponsible leader whereas in the film, Fidel: The Untold Story he is portrayed as a hero, a friend, and a great leader. There were multiple views that these two films showed Fidel Castro as who he is supposed to be. The article History Will Absolve Me showed Castro when he was in court for trial and backing him up with the conditions of Cuba, which demonstrated how Castro cared about Cuba and its people. These two films covered the same topic yet so differ in their interpretations of Castro because depend on which side are you on; there are things that make more sense and things that are not. In the film Fidel: The Untold Story portrays Fidel Castro as a hero especially in Latin America countries and Africa, and there is very little negative side of him shown …show more content…

The film showed more various sides of Castro: in the beginning of the film, Castro was seen as a savior from the dictator in Cuba, he restored their people’s dignity from when American ran the island. The people in Cuba live a lot better when the dictator Batista was in control. Slowly as the film progressed, as Fidel Castro gained control of the government, he changed. There was another side of Castro as the film showed Fidel as an admirer of Hitler and Mussolini at a young age, which both of them was not democratic. He became a big spender on things for women and people who were loyal to him. There are several negative issues that were mentioned about Fidel in this film such as in the scene where they showed Castro as an irresponsible ruler when he held a secret accounts for spending. As it was said on the film, “the accounts were spending at least $25,000 a month, mostly on items for women (The Last Communist

Open Document