More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantage of feedback in communication
Disadvantage of feedback in communication
Disadvantage of feedback in communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantage of feedback in communication
In this paper they discussed 360 feedback of a Romanian company. It talked about different sources of evaluating human resource performance. It also talked about different types of performances like contextual performance, task performance, adaptive performance etc. Feedback is an important tool that people at work give to an employee regarding his/her performance to improve his/her good performance and correct poor behaviour. It is up to recipient whether to accept it or reject it. Major source of feedback is from managers as they establish performance objectives. Two types of performance evaluation methods were considered here. They are Classical and Multi-Source feedback.
In classical performance appraisal the performance is measured against the organizational standards. It has many pitfalls like it is based on single evaluator, addresses only formal aspects of the job performance etc.. Supervisor is responsible for the feedback. Even though he takes inputs from others, the final call stays with him.
As feedback is one form of providing information to an employee about his/her pe...
Many nursing experts believe that evaluation is the most crucial part of employee development. Debate the pros and cons of this statement and decide whether the statement is true. If it is not true, then what constitutes the most important part of employee development?
In the workplace feedback is given among employees or from leaders to employees. A performance review is an example of how employers can provide constructive feedback to their employees to help them identify their strengths and weaknesses to assist them to improve and develop the necessary skills to be successful within the organization. For information on how to provide better feedback, please visit: http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-feedback.html
Positive and/or negative feedback can drastically change an employee’s job performance by keeping them on task and motivating them to be more involved, and allowing them to more positively identify with the organization. The Radiant Spirit’s cruise staff currently receives employee evaluations through commentary cards that the cruise ships passengers leave. The passenger’s comment cards are then collected by the director of the Radiant to evaluate the performance of each employee. Furthermore, the director determines the possible employee promotions or demotions based on feedback left by the cruise ship’s passengers. By changing the ship’s current evaluation system to 360 feedback, using a combination of feedback from passengers and supervisors, the crew could potentially increase their job performance by 68%. By taking into account two different perspectives on the employees’ performance instead of just one, the supervisors can determine whether the employee is actually doing a poor job or if the passenger was being
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
According to Coker (2015), “feedback is considered essential for motor skill acquisition as it assists in guiding the learner in modifying subsequent movement attempts” (p. 31). I believe this is partially in line with Knowledge of Performance (KP) because KP is about the nature of the movement pattern itself and it does not necessarily tell about success in terms of goal achievement (Schmidt & Lee, 2014).
Based on your view of the objectives of performance evaluation, evaluate the perspectives about performance appraisal presented by the managers.
The 360-degree feedback system can be very delicate in nature. A person not well ready for it could be thrown out of balance. It can also generate some new problem in an organisation. It not designed and conducted well, it posses the potential danger of a candidate developing wrong perceptions or notions about one or more of his auditor and creating new perspective towards them. It is therefore, unavoidable and significant to handle the process well and make it foolproof. The first important step is to examine whether the organisation is ready for it or not. The second important step is to examine if the candidate is ready for it. For the purpose of systematic analysis and examination of the problem at hand, the studies by the several researchers have been reviewed. Baron, (2009) examines that managers who received upward feedback about their supervisory behaviour significantly improved their behaviour and improves the subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Similarly, Baron, (2009) found that employees were favourably disposed toward associate rating. The feedback is positively related with fulfilment with prior peer ratings and negatively associated with perceived friendship bias and years of company experience. Subordinates’ ratings of leadership were significantly higher following feedback from subordinates under which a highly structured session is there where leaders discussed the feedback results with subordinates (Baron, 2009).
Section 1: The focus of many managers is most often on the wrong things. They focus on appraisal rather than planning. Performance appraisal is not performance management. Managers often focus on a one-way flow of words (manager to employee) rather than dialogue. Performance management and the end of the year appraisal are often seen as a necessary evil. They don’t realize that if carried out properly, performance management has the potential to fix many of the problems they’re facing.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
Human Resources Management (HRM) have been increasing aware by Business Studies and Organisation Management approaches because it closely related to organisational daily and organisational performances (Kalleberg & Moody, 1994). Human resources practices are suggested have influences on improving organisational performances in most organisations. Basically, oorganisational performances refer to the outcomes of employees performances and daily working which reflect the ability of one organisation fulfil its objectives and goals, such as employee’s performances, productivities, employee’s job satisfaction, financial outcomes (Huselid, 1995).
The 360-degree feedback or multi sources feedback is assessment, which comes from other employees. This feedback contains direct and indirect information from managers, colleagues, subordinates as well as self-evaluation data. Also, it includes other external sources such as customers and suppliers reports. The 360-degree feedback plays a significant role to help workers develop their performance. Human resources professionals are increasingly using this assessment. The main propose of the 360 feedback is to encourage employees to seek out information about their performance, skills and working relations. The origin of 360-feedback came from the German military during World War II. They started using multiple sources in order to evaluate officer’s performance (Thornton, 2014). In this paper, I am going to explore some key principles and actions that can help a manager increase their 360-degree feedback ratings. The paper will identify manager perspective of job performance, environmental factors influencing employee review of managers, and perspective of customers and suppliers satisfaction. Also, actions will be suggested for affective applications of the principles.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective
Human Resource Development (HRD) is often seen to be a central feature of SHRM. Discuss the role and importance of HRD in achieving SHRM organizational outcomes.