Fear Of Death Beit-Hallahmi Analysis

1558 Words4 Pages

I analyzed the “Fear of the Dead, Fear of Death: is it Biological or Psychological?” by Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi in 2012 for the generation of the death fear (Beit-Hallahmi 328). From Beit-Hallahmi’s work, he states the fear comes from the “cognitive incongruity” and the brain detects the situation is conflicting to the expectation (Beit-Hallahmi 328). Then the brain would combine the past and present experience to produce a response of fear to the imagined situation (Beit-Hallahmi 328). He also mentions the fear of death would lead to the other effect and behavior, such as the fear of corpse. (Beit-Hallahmi 322). In this paper, first, I will use these scholars’ works to support my research. Second, to make the research more convincing, I explore …show more content…

The person knows after he dies the trees will still be there, but he will not be able to look at them again (Eric 8). Therefore that person wants to see trees as poignancy as possible (Eric 8). Why and how does he generate this kind of feeling? In Ian Burney’s “War on fear: Solly Zuckerman and civilian nerve in the Second World War.” Burney asks two questions about the fear of death “why was it ‘so fascinated by fear, why that emotion made to account for everything?”(Kuklick quoted in Burney 50). According to Hebb’s discrepancy theory, Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi argues that the fear of death “stems” from “cognitive incongruity” in his “Fear of the Dead, Fear of Death: is it Biological or Psychological?” (Hebb quoted in Benjamin 328). Beit-Hallahmi also raps that the brain operates like a comparison device, it can match up past and present occurrences and then it reacts to discrepancies between expectation and perception (Hebb quoted in Benjamin 328). When scholars Beit-Hallahmi and Argyle claim that “The …show more content…

In the Cave’s speech, according to ancient philosopher Epicurus’s theory “death is nothing to us, because when we are here, death is not, and when death is here, we are gone"(Cave 13:00). My response to this theory is that death is an inexistent thing to us, therefore I do not need to feel fear about death. Moreover I find an interesting experiment that is "One recent study took two groups of agnostics, that is people who are undecided in their religious beliefs. Now, one group was asked to think about being dead. The other group was asked to think about being lonely. They were then asked again about their religious beliefs. Those who had been asked to think about being dead were afterwards twice as likely to express faith in God and Jesus. Twice as likely. Even though the before they were all equally agnostic. But put the fear of death in them, and they run to Jesus."(Cave 5:20) I feel that there is a particular religious bias when people think about death as in the study about death, agnostics would sometimes have thoughts of religious people, such as Jesus, when they think of death. This shows there could be a potential bias of people being misled by religion. I discover the result of this experiment is same as the SBS experiments I mentioned above. In my view, the similarity between Beit-Hallahmi and Cave is both two scholars believes the fear death can lead

Open Document