Fat tax will help reduce the amount of consumption of sugary drinks and might help with the economy. It helps change people's mentality in what they buy and in what they consume. It may reduce obesity and change people's eating habit in many ways just by the changing the price of one drink. "There has been many study that indicate that the change in price of a product changes the way people think of the item. If the price goes up then people will think twice before buying the product. Adding a high tax on unhealthy food and drinks may help slow the rising rates of obesity, according to a new study published Tuesday in the British Medical Journal. Previous studies suggest that the sharp tax increase on cigarettes in 2009 has contributed to the …show more content…
"Encouraging a healthier diet is at the core of the junk food tax and will also act to help food producers create a larger supply of foods that are lower in sugar and fat. Also, fast food outlets would be encouraged to provide healthier items on their menu as well. The revenues that are raised can be used for a number of purposes, but overall it does mean more money to address the issues of obesity in the country. When combined with other taxes, this form of taxation could avoid being regressive and impacting lower income families disproportionally as some critics have seen it (Robbins)." By the most part this is a good idea because can encourage people not to buy surgery drinks or candy from grocery stores. Instead they will buy things that cost less or things that are healthier in price as well as in your normal human health. More tax on fatty foods will discourage some buyers from buying foods that don't really help for there health. Increasing the price for fatty foods may decrease the demand them. If that happens it will increase the demands for foods that cost less which might include healthier foods for the consumer. "Many foods that mightObesity causes a greater risk of heart disease, diabetes, stroke and angina of which a junk food tax would help pay to offset in terms of the
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans over eat because their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation and putting a stop on it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised more to help prevent American obesity.
Section 2: Congress hereby finds that trans fat is ruining America’s health with high medical costs, more health problems, and lastly, jeopardizing its youth’s health.
Obesity has become a growing epidemic in the United States of America. Federal agencies, authors of diet books, and others have offered advice on how to lose weight but none seem to work since the epidemic is still on the rise. In the article “The Feds’ Fib about Low-Fat,” Michael Fumento argues that the low-fat myth government agencies have inadvertently promoted can be deceiving and not healthy for the individual. This article is a syndicated column that has appeared in newspapers around the country, therefore allowing for a diversified audience. The audience of this article includes adults from all over the country who are concerned about the low-fat controversy and adults who are up-to-date on the latest political issues. Fumento claims
Obesity is clinically defined as a body mass index (BMI) of above 30kg/m2 and is the accumulation of excess adipose tissue1. It is currently viewed as an epidemic due to the increasingly large proportion of adults who are now obese, with the incidence rapidly rising in the recent years. In a five year period from 1995-2000 there was a predicted increase of 100 million obese individuals world-wide 2. In UK it is estimated that over 25% of adult males and females are obese and it is thought that these figures will continually rise with estimations that 60% of adult men and 50% of adult woman with be obese by 2025.3 Being a huge burden on the NHS, it has been predicted that £5 billion a year is spent on preventing and treating the complications of excessive weight in the UK, which is almost 5% of the total NHS budget (£5billion/£108billion).4 The cost of obesity on the NHS will rise to correlate with the increasing incidence illustrated.
It led to loss of jobs for many Danish people and it also increased the administrative costs for companies that fell under the tax (Vallgårda, Holm, and Jensen 224). The fat tax even led some native Danish people to run across the border to neighboring countries to get their favorite fattening foods at a lower cost than in Denmark (Khazan 2). These trips across the border led local businesses to go under because of lack of business (Vallgårda, Holm, and Jensen 225). So, although a fat tax would gain revenue for possible programs on eating healthier, it would increase unemployment and economic failures. The fat tax would harm future businesses leading many manufacturers to avoid dealing with the tax
In the movie Eddie and the rest of the gamblers are depicted as just normal people. They are not considered to be criminals to others or to each other. Eddie could be depicted as a tricky person, because of how he tries to influence people when playing them in pool. He is also an intelligent person that is highly skilled at what he does. Along with Minnesota Fats, another character that is very skilled in pool but not seen as a criminal or as an enemy. Minnesota Fats is viewed as a person of interest to the other characters because he is the best at pool and everyone wants to beat him. Eddies character changes when he is playing Minnesota Fats, the first time Eddie was very aggressive and cocky. Compared to the second time where Eddie was very
In the UK as well as in other developed countries, obesity is becoming a growing problem this puts pressure on health services and affects individuals’ ability to work, and contribute to the economy. The government feels the pressure to act by taxing unhealthy foods and drinks, and by setting up educational campaigns, (Stephen Adams, 2011).
We can choose what kinds of food to put into our bodies, and junk food is part of our culture. For example, according to a food professional and writer of an article called, “Junk-Food Taxes Would Be Unfair and Ineffective,” Pamela Parseghian explains that, “No matter how well funds are invested for improving society, the suggestion of adding federal fat tax is ridiculous.
The Fat Tax Act that is being adopted around the world, while also being rejected by many people has imposed a tax on foods high in fat and sugar contents. A Fat Tax might work in theory but it would have multiple real life setbacks considering a Fat Tax would add to the hunger epidemic in poorer communities, while not effectively curbing sugar and fat consumptions as people continue to purchase cheaper, less healthy food. All around the world in low-income communities, the people spend most of their income on food. It was believed to be beneficial in the universal fight against obesity, but it will have deeper repercussions. Many people around the world are standing up against the Fat Tax, further proving that it is overall a better idea
A balanced diet is necessary for being healthy and which means you must eat the right ratio of the three main macronutrients which are fat, protein, and carbohydrates. If too much of one macronutrient is eaten , there will be a possibility of health problems. An example would be high fat consumption, leading to an increased risk of heart disease or obesity. It can be difficult choosing the right foods mainly because of processed foods. If you don't read the nutrition labels, you might be making a mistake.
The first problem with this method is identification of which foods should be taxed higher. There are many challenges in determining which foods are considered healthy. If it was decided that sugar content would be the deciding factor, people could substitute for foods high in fat. The opposite holds true if fat content was chosen as the deciding factor; furthermore, many foods such as avocado, olive oil, and nuts are high in fat, but have many health benefits. Foods such as these prove that catch-all regulations would prove troublesome. Taxation of specific food groups has been proven to be ineffective in curbing obesity by researchers. Soda is often considered to be a leading cause of obesity, so it would stand to reason that higher taxes would lower obesity. A study conducted by American researchers showed that sales taxes on soda had very little impact on obesity levels (Powell, 2009). Even if the tax lowers soda consumption, a significant portion of people will still consume excess calories, and obesity will still be an issue. Taxing junk food is an ineffective measure; if people want specific things, they will find a way to obtain
Obesity is a very serious issue in the United States. “The percentage of obese adults has more than doubled over the last 30 years; the percentage of obese children has tripled” (Bittman). But what is the cause? Many believe that obesity is a direct result of the diet of most Americans: specifically, the amount of “junk food” (unhealthy, fatty foods and beverages) that they take in. But what can the country do to solve this issue? One idea that has been presented is that the government put a tax on these unhealthy foods. But is taxing junk food really the right way to go?
In recent years, obesity has been a huge problem in our society and even after Americans have become aware of obesity it still has not disappeared or shown a major decline in obesity rates. For the same reason, the government has taxes on tobacco to discourage the usage of smoking and the same thing can be done to junk food and soft drinks in order to lower the percentage of the population that is obese. Most people argue that a fat tax on junk food and soft drinks will affect the poorer population as they spend a greater part of their income on junk food compared to the rest of the population, which is true with the cigarette tax as well that over the long-term the policy will make up for the cost and overall be a good policy. Obesity is a
With the aim of changing the unhealthy eating habits of some families and children, Australian government has involved in many sensible plans and ideas. Recently, the Federal Government’s preventive taskforce report has discussed of taxes to influence healthy food. According to Coalition senior adviser Jane Martin: “The best mix would be to increase the price of unhealthy foods and to subsidise fresh foods” (Miletic 2009, pg.3).