Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociological analysis of a movie
Simple sociological analysis
Simple sociological analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sociological analysis of a movie
Falling down is a powerful movie. It touches on aspects of society that will always exist among us and we all have to put up with each day. This movie represents a monster that I cannot help but to sympathize with. Many may view this movie as a social commentary or a sort condemnation of our modern society. But on a personal level, I believe it represents the degree of frustration within each of us. It shows how little control we have on what is going on around us in terms of socioeconomics, ethnics and local government aspects. The movie starts with D-fens sitting in his car stuck in traffic, no AC, loud music and loud children on a school bus. This ultimately leads him to abandon his car in the middle of traffic and decides to walk home. …show more content…
This scene explains how biased many institutions can be, and how absurd it is to see that your racial ethnicity may determine whether or not you’re a profitable project to invest in. this scene may have helped spurring prop 209 which prohibit public institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, sex, or ethnicity. Then he goes inside a gun store that is owned by neo-Nazi enthusiast. The owner thinks D-fens is a member but was proven wrong. This scene may explain how whites think minorities/immigrants are taking over major cities turning whites into minorities. Furthermore, the scene highlights an explanation as why many Americans concerned about illegal immigrant, but this also leads to a mix up between legal and illegal immigrants when viewed by white majorities. Speaking in terms of our previous discussions, many Americans believe that legal/illegal immigrants are living off public benefits and do not contribute in any ways to the publics good. The subject may have helped spurring proposition …show more content…
My personal experience shows the impact of diversity on the environment that I live in. diversity slowly turns any environment into a melting pot, furthermore, culture diversity will heavily reduce the impact of any dominant race that has a continuous influx of other ethnic minorities. From the above statement, we can deduce that the identity and culture of the dominant race will lose its
The movie I am doing my reflection on is the documentary film “Harvest of Empire: A History of Latinos in America”. This film focuses on the United States economic relationship and impact on Latinos in the nation as well as the Latin American countries to the south. It does this by going into the history of the U.S. and its people along with its international polices. Which brings up a very disturbing and sad picture as we see just how manipulative and controlling our nation is and how far it goes to ensure its stakes and views are protected.
New worldly conflicts arise everyday and many of these conflicts make us question our morals as individuals and as a nation. In both “Flight Patterns” and “The Help: A Feel-Good Movie That Feels Kind of Icky” we are introduced into the conflicts that race bring about in everyday life. It is indisputable that race is hard to talk about and everyone seems to have a different stance on what is racism and what is not. In both stories, race is brought up and talked about in a way that is solely bringing truth to the issue. In Sherman Alexie’s story we see the thought process about race from someone who is not white, and in Dana Stevens’ story we see how a white woman sees controversy in a film that is supposed to be about black women. Both stories
Many immigrant and minority narratives concentrate their efforts on the positive side of the American dream. These particular stories narrate a person's struggle and rise through the ranks of the Am6rican hierarchy focusing on the opportunities that seem to abound in this country. While these stories are well and good. they do seem to soft peddle the flip side of this country's attitude toward the immigrant and minority. America is a land of milk and honey and opportunity, but unfortunately most new officiates or unwilling participants in the American culture face an American nightmare that leaves its effects on the individuals, families and cultures for generations to come. America has its own deeply seated prejudices and stereotypes of people from outside its walI5 and these prejudices force some immigrants and minorities either to abandon former cultural ties in order to assimilate or to strap on the baldric of equality that changes their lives forever.
This essay will be explaining the definition of sociology, the sociological factors of obesity using Symbolic Interactionism Theory and the Functionalism Theory and a description of the medical condition obesity and how it may affect individuals suffering from it.
One of the biggest, growing debates today is the issue of immigration into the U.S. I just don’t understand why there’s such a big debate. I compare this issue to the issue of racism in the way that, no matter what you do, "they" are always going to be here, and it is only ignorance that keeps the issue ablaze. The fact that migrants are not mostly white these days, also makes the issue one more of race. As Charles S. Clark puts it in The New Immigrants, "In the 1990’s, Americans who grew up in a historically white, Anglo-Saxon society are having to adjust to a Polish-born chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, John Shalikashvili; to Spanish-language editions of People magazine on Seven-11 shelves; and to Buddhist temples and Islamic mosques rising in their communities." In the case of immigration, though, the ignorance is apparent in both the immigrant and the non-immigrant.
Several states allow undocumented aliens to use their resources for free regardless of their lack of healthcare insurance. This causes a debt that must in turn be solved by increased taxes. It forces people to make a decision of granting them citizenship or remove them from the country all together. Both of these options would be both costly but time and resource consuming. Thousands upon thousands of dollars are spent every year patrolling and protecting the border but these immigrants still find ways into the country. If there were to be a more open or lenient border between the United States and Mexico and immigrants were granted citizenship, the country would end up saving incredible amounts of money. New problems would surface as a result though. The citizens that want to remove them from the country support their stance from the basis that if we allow the immigrants to stay in the country we may begin to lose jobs. This is due to a flooded market of uneducated unskilled laborers from foreign countries that are willing to work for less wages as long as they can secure a job. This perspective that the illegal immigrants would take jobs was quickly corrected due to its overly exaggerated basis by a liberally fueled population. It was stated in the film that even though these immigrants would
The government being part of the public sector has used its dominating power to create several policies that assist in the oppression of people of color. These policies have also helped in the development of stereotypes that hinder people of color. For many individuals of color these policies have helped whites carry out their prejudices without being reprimanded. There has been discriminating polices made for several different government, state, and city affairs. However, the policies on immigration, welfare, and housing have made enormous impacts on people of color. Though these policies do not outright say the desired discriminatory outcomes, the deceitful ways they are written help produce them. The immigration policies were created after the influx of Hispanics coming into America for work; though the government was responsible for enticing them. There has been a push pull push back factor (class notes 10-27-10) ass...
The image uses labels to show how different people view immigrants. Groups like average citizens, workmen, and health officers viewed migrants as menaces, labor threats, and disease ridden. While politicians, contractors and Uncle Sam himself see these newcomers as sources of votes, cheap labor and strength. We see whiteness in “The Immigrant” as American society is more willing to consider accepting white European immigrants into American society, while simultaneously refusing to allow chinese immigrants into the country. Migrants of white decent were also allowed U.S. citizenship after remaining in the country for only two years and showing good moral character. This led to an increasing white population which promoted the idea of Americanness and whiteness being nearly interchangeable. When looking at both images side by side we see the biases of white and
The movie builds up to a climax where a number of occurrences that expose the intensity of white liberal racism and its rooted connection to privilege and power. Often times the corporate media avoids absolute criticism of white liberal America in order to satisfy the capitalist appeal that controls Hollywood. Get out illustrates racism generally within the boundaries of interpersonal social relations, with some remarks to the connection between white liberal racism and the benefit purpose at large. This movie can certainly be applied to the structure of the US society because of its illustration of interpersonal racisms between the white wealthy liberal classes and Black people. The movie makes very clear that racism is a uniformed operation designed for the oppression of Black American. “Get out’s” message can further on reveal the entirety of US imperialism’s broad design. Just as Chris found that his girlfriend Rose was a racist in disguise, is the same as millions of people in the US finding out that the Democratic party is an Imperialist party in disguise, “the Democratic Party, which has for the same period of time served as the graveyard of social movements and the more digestible form of imperialism for so-called progressives”(Haiphong,
The central conflict stem from the mitigation and assimilation factors that immigrants face. To assume that all Mexicans follow a clear path that will result in the same thing is nonsense, as Mexicans are as multifaceted as every other culture. As one will see that the conflicting part of this play is the fact that there are a menagerie of stereotypes. With so many types who will one person assume that one is better then another creating a conundrum, of which results in an adverse result. But as much as the conflict that arise from certain situations tend to result in another problem. It becomes a never ending story that tend to stigmatize groups of people.
For me I found that to this day, the Native Americans still lead a rough life due to what the white man has done to them in the past. However, instead of buckling under the pressure of centuries, much of their culture still struggles and lives on inside each successive generation. I would recommend this movie to anyone, and I'm sure that I will end up sending it to my family back home. Not only would I recommend watching the movie, but I would urge all to see beneath the surface story and find the hidden messages underneath.
The United States is facing illegal complexities that are affecting the people. “Immigration Problem Is about Us, Not Them,” by Jo-Ann Pilardi poses some powerful arguments that get readers thinking about who the culprits actually are behind the illegal immigrants coming across the southwestern border. First she declares that citizens in the United States use the word “illegal” in a “narrow” way, therefore causing americans to oversee other “illegal” activities. Then she goes on to explain that it is the “INE’s” (illegal native employers) that are truly responsible for the illegal immigrants sneaking through in the first place and elaborates that these buisness owners aren’t getting proper surveillance for these illegal activities. She closes by unfolding the United States’s problem of demanding cheap labor that results in relying on illegal immigrants. The opening argument is ironically a stereotype in itself, but it is logically correct. However, the fault comes in the
When immigrants first got America and when they settle in, they began to question their own name. Immigrants ask themselves what those who already lived in America will think about them because they came from Europe. In the text Rodriguez insist, “There is something unsettling about immigrants because...well, because they chatter incomprehensibly, and they get in everyone’s way. Immigrants seem to bent on undoing America. Just when Americans think we know are we are protestants, culled from Western Europe, are we not?- then new immigrants appear from Southern Europe or from Eastern Europe. We- we who are already here-were don’t know exactly what the latest comers will mean to our community. How will they fit with us? Thus we- we who were here first-we begin to question our own identify”,If you come to America, they don’t look at your culture they look at your race and judge you of what you are or where you come from. In American history, race has always been inquest of black or white. No longer are Americans describing themselves as individual black or white. In the text Rodriguez explain, “The American conversation about race has always been a black-and-white conversation, but the conversation has become as bloodless as
Sociology relates to this novel in so many different ways. The family in the story, Flowers in the Attic, written by V.C. Andrews, starts off as a family of procreation, a family established through marriage, which includes the mother (Mrs. Dollanger), the father (Mr. Dollanger), and the four children: Cathy (the oldest daughter), Chris (the second oldest son), Carrie and Corey (the young twins). A conflict begins when the father dies in a car wreck, so the mother and her four children must move in her rich parents estate because they have no money and nowhere to stay. After the father's death, the norms of the children changed. The norms of the children were to stay hidden in the basement by them selves because Mrs. Dollanger may only earn back the right to inherit her father's estate by falsifying that she has no children by her husband who was also her half-uncle. The original agreement was that they can leave the basement when their grandfather dies. The rules of the house were given by the dying grandfather that stated if Mrs. Dollanger was found to have children that she would be disinherited again.
Diversity is a notion, when applied to the majority of circumstances, can create a positive conclusion. The trick to producing a positive outcome is often how the different aspects are brought together. Consider a classic dinner combination peas and carrots, the two colors look appealing and the two flavors comes together as one making a superb side dish. Now consider oil and water, these two substance are not often considered a good combination. Although, this is not always the case; olive oil and vinegar (which is water based) when mixed, come together into a delectable salad dressing. Diversity and inclusion should also apply to humans by bringing people together who are different it can creates a whole that is enhanced by the uniqueness of each individual.