Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the relationship between religion and politics
Political rhetoric and the media and the public
Importance of rhetoric
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Opening-
There is no stronger and more globally important issue than that of peace. We as humans live in this world amongst hatred, differences and violence, a world where equality seems to be impossible. However it is that truly extraordinary minority of people like Faith Bandler and Anwar Sadat, who worked with what they have to empower others and to take action on issues that relegate peace in the world. Their speeches encourage and challenge us to open our hearts and minds to the injustices that resonate even today in the 21st century and inspire us to see the world in a new light using dialogue and the power of rhetoric rather than carnage.
Body
Faith Bandler’s ‘Faith hope and reconciliation’ is a timeless masterpiece in my opinion. The speeches simplicity yet powerful underlying message reminds me of a modern Gettysburg address.
Bandler grew up as a struggling Indigenous Australian. "We were always begging for books, never had enough and always wished for a piano or violin". Despite her struggles she went on to be the first Indigenous to complete the HSC in 1932. Even after Bandler grew up she experienced Inequality towards Indigenous Australians like- no rights to vote, unequal wages and other basic rights that had to be fought for. Bandler is recognised as a renowned Aboriginal Activist who played a major role in the 1967 referendum which was successful with a 91% majority vote.
Her invitation by ‘the indigenous people of the Illawarra’ made her to speak at the Convention, where she discussed issues of reconciliation that would inspire other like-minded people. Her themes throughout the speech are on universal values, not only between Aboriginal people, but all ‘decent people’ who understand ‘the past, the terrible indi...
... middle of paper ...
...ech I have finally realised. Speeches like these encourage us to consider a pluralistic way of seeing the world that encourages unity, diversity, equity and most importantly peace. They will always remain significant within society and will never become dependent on shaping today’s society but be a memory of our past and a reminder of who we are today. Only very few texts still remain today that are highly regarded as being timeless and have the ability to still be understood in today’s society. I believe this is attributed to the underlying significant themes and ideas such as justice that will continue to appeal to people and allow them to sympathise with the author disregarding the time period. The themes behind the everlasting texts give the audience to have a universal perception and interpretation that can differ depending on external factors and ways of life.
The National Apology of 2008 is the latest addition to the key aspects of Australia’s reconciliation towards the Indigenous owners of our land. A part of this movement towards reconciliation is the recognition of Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders rights to their land. Upon arrival in Australia, Australia was deemed by the British as terra nullius, land belonging to no one. This subsequently meant that Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders were never recognised as the traditional owners. Eddie Mabo has made a highly significant contribution to the rights and freedoms of Indigenous Australians as he was the forefather of a long-lasting court case in 1982 fighting for the land rights of the Torres Strait Islanders. Eddie Mabo’s introduction of the Native Title Act has provided Indigenous Australians with the opportunity to state claim to their land, legally recognising the Indigenous and the Torres Strait Islanders as the traditional owners.
Summary of Text: ‘The Redfern Address’ is a speech that was given to a crowd made up of mainly indigenous Australians at the official opening of the United Nations International Year of the World’s Indigenous Peoples in Redfern Park, New South Wales. This text deals with many of the challenges that have been faced by Indigenous Australians over time, while prompting the audience to ask themselves, ‘How would I feel?’ Throughout the text, Keating challenges the views of history over time, outlines some of the outrageous crimes committed against the Indigenous community, and praises the indigenous people on their contribution to our nation, despite the way they have been treated.
In August 2008 a ‘Statement of Reconcilliation’ was released by the Hornsby Shire and Council in conjunction with the local traditional custodians. The statement discusses the policies in which the community alleges to follow including; education to all those within the Hornsby district on the topic of Aboriginal history, to respect the survival of the indigenous and protect all indigenous sites. The reconciliation statement concludes with a an apology to the Guringai people and acknowledges the lost and trauma in which they all went through. This in conjunction with the national apology by Kevin Rudd in 2008, displays a major change within society. The country and local communities were educated in the statement “this was their land and water and that they remain its spiritual custodians.” (NSW Reconciliation Council, 2008).
...ndigenous recognition and the removal of racist remarks has been an on-going theme for a vast majority of time. The necessity of Constitutional reform to close the gap on cultural divide as well as support the on-going concept of reconciliation is essential in ensuring Australia continues to improve and nurture its relationship with Indigenous peoples. The process of amendment through referendum has proven to be problematic in the past, with the success rate exceptionally low. Though with key factors such as bi-partisan support, widespread public knowledge and correct management, the alteration to remove racial discrimination and provide recognition for Indigenous persons within the Constitution is highly achievable. If proposed and eventually passed, this will provide assistance in eliminating many of the cultural gaps Indigenous persons face throughout society.
“We can change anything. We can make a just and peaceful world. History has shown that a genuine people’s movement can move more than governments. It can move mountains” (World People 's Blog, 2006). These are the insightful words of Faith Bandler, one of the most significant women in the ten-year campaign for the rights of the Australian Aboriginal which ultimately led to the 1967 Referendum. Faith Bandler was given many popular awards by the media some of which include; being listed as a national living treasure in 1997 by The National Trust, being included as one of the 100 most influential Australians of the 20th century by the Herald in 2001, and being included in a list of 50 women considered the most influential in the world by The Good
Paul Tillich. “What Faith Is”. The Human Experience: Who Am I?. 8th ed. Winthrop University: Rock Hill SC, 2012. 269-273. Print.
In its broadest sense ‘Reconciliation’ is the Australian term that refers to the unity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. To support reconciliation means working to overcome the separation and inequality between all Australians (Australia, n.d.). In 1992, then Prime Minister Paul Keating, delivered the Redfern Park speech that publically acknowledged European soldiers were responsible for many crimes against Indigenous communities, "We committed the murders. We took the children from their mothers. We practiced discrimination and exclusion. It was our ignorance and our prejudice (Government, 1992)." Since 1993, Reconciliation Week is a national event that celebrates a positive and respectful relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. It enables all Australians to close the gaps, and to achieve a shared sense of fairness and justice. The ultimate goal of the week is to build a strong and trusting relationships between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and other Australians, as a foundation for success and to enhance national wellbeing (Australia, n.d.). However, this advocacy for Indigenous rights and recognition was advanced be civil right activists in the 1950’s and 1960’s. One significant activist from this period and until her death in 1993 was Oodgeroo Noonuccal. Oodgeroo Noonuccal has significantly contributed to the civil rights of the Indigenous people in Australia due to her tireless campaigning to educate non-Indigenous Australians and enact political change that would not only recognize Indigenous Australian and Torres Strait Islander people within the census but further understand their rich and diverse culture. Noonuccal’s contribution can be seen through her significa...
and Jews worship God’ who ‘commands peace’ therefore they must pursue it. Here he cogently conflates logos and pathos to promote coexistence, and momentously declares ‘we accept to live with you.’ As stability in oil-rich regions was favourable, Sadat was well received by western pundits, being named Time’s Man of the Year. Simultaneously, he compellingly persuaded middle eastern audiences by demonstrating a moral, religious high ground through his meticulous rhetoric, thus supporting Plato’s
... reflects the accomplishments made in four centuries. While man still does not have absolute free speech, he is not so suppressed that he must hide his feelings by literary means.
“Today we honour the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures in human History. We reflect on their past mistreatment. We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations—this blemished chapter in our nation’s history. The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia’s history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians” (apology by Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, 16th November 2009, Parliament House, Canberra.)
January 26th 1930 was the 150th anniversary of the First Fleet in Australia. For the whites it was a day to celebrate but for the Indigenous people of Australia it was a day to mourn. It was a day to mourn the loss of their country, their freedom and self-determination. This day was the first time Aboriginal activist groups from different states had fully cooperated, “it was, therefore, the first national Aboriginal civil rights gathering and represents the most clearly identifiable beginning of the contemporary Aboriginal political movement” (L). For the non-indigenous Australians, the protest seemed to be out of the blue, little did they know the political activity that climaxed on the Day of Mourning in Sydney had been building up for some
In his 1974 speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Yasser Arafat said: “The difference between the revolutionary and the terrorist lies in the reason for which he fights…for the justice of the cause determines the right to struggle.” In this same speech, Arafat addresses the international community and provides commentary on a multitude of different subjects. He traces what he believes to be the positive and increasingly popular growth of the United Nations, mentioning the inclusion of three new member states: Guinea-Bissau, Bangladesh, and Grenada. This diversification of the UN membership, according to him, is an indicator of the general trend in the world at that time towards “freedom.” In this bit of tendentious logic, as one has license to expect, Arafat takes this-the erosion of colonial power and the upending trends of international finance, for instance-to mean that the world, through the focal point of the UN, is at a threshold. This threshold, of course, straddles the nadir of Old-World injustice and subjugation and the zenith of universal liberty and co-prosperity. The world therefore “aspires to peace, justice, equality and freedom” and that “it hopes to place the relations between nations on a basis of equality, peaceful coexistence, mutual respect for each other’s internal affairs, secure national sovereignty, independence and territorial unity on the basis of justice and mutual benefit (emphasis added).” Arafat explicitly acknowledges then that this universalizing trend in the premier international forum signals a trend; of new composition, new identity, and consequently new aims. He argues that this newfound dedication, deftly grafted onto the original aims and purposes of the UN, carries with it not merely proced...
THESIS: In Hemmingway's The Snows of Kilimanjaro and O'Conner's A Good Man Is Hard to Find the authors similarly argue through , that redemption can only be achieved by those who truly have faith in their belief.
True communication, like the charity it requires, begins at home. Perhaps a peacemaking should start small. I am not suggesting for a moment that we should abandon global peacemaking efforts. I am dubious, however, as to how far we can move toward global community--which is the only way to achieve international peace--until we learn the basic principles of community in our own individual lives and personal spheres of influence. (Peck 17-18)
World peace is desperately needed by the people all over the world that seems to be futile in the current state of our societal behavior, which is in fact caused by political, economic, and religion aspects. As though a lot of factors latently exist, we, the people, the society, aren’t aware of what to and not to do in order to take action. That is seemingly the problem with us, we do know the effects or the possible outcome