Fair Work Commission Case Study

1806 Words4 Pages

In this part, the task is to explain the role of the Fair Work Commission and the powers it is able to exercise in relation to this process. The Fair Work Commission is the self-governing national workplace relations tribunal and its main concern is to sustain a safety standard of salaries and working conditions, as well as other related areas such as workplace regulation and function (Australian Government, 2015). The character of the Fair Work Commission is to ensure that the negotiating process and industrial activity are carried out in accordance to the Commonwealth workplace laws. Bargaining representatives of workers must contact the Fair Work Commission before they want to take industrial action to assist their claims (Australian Government, …show more content…

According to FWC, it has the power to review the minimum remunerations received by workers in the national workplace relations system and the adjustment is made every year on 1 July (Fair Work Commission, 2014). The managers and workers cannot accept to a pay rate which is less than the valid minimum wage. The review deliberates the pay rates in the modern awards and the national minimum wage; moreover, it is compulsory for the Fair Work Commission to create a national minimum wage instruction annually for national standard income and special national standard income (Fair Work Commission, 2014). It has the power to provide a standard of low income and the power to review the minimum wages received by workers in the national workplace relations system and the adjustment is made every year on 1 July (Fair Work Commission, …show more content…

There was evidence shown that the unfair dismissal requirements were the furthermost conflicting and inconsistent from the manager’s perspective. The Fair Work Act applied unfair dismissal requirements for entirely workers, regardless of the population of workers in the business (Chapman, 2015). The Fair Work Act presents two cases that dismissal could be reasonable, including other dismissal and summary dismissal. In the first case, the law offers a sequence of stages such as concluded checklist, copies of notice, declaration of dismissal and a witness announcement with signature that managers must follow with the intention to reduce the problem (Chapman, 2015). In the second case, managers may dismiss a worker without notice due to theft or fraud. As the consequence, the amount of cases in relation to unfair dismissal has risen significantly since the Fair Work Act implemented as law. In addition to the growing records of cases in relation to unfair dismissal, the judgements from Fair Work Australia showed some contradicting clarifications of the Fair Work Act (Chapman, 2015). According to an example, a business in Albury- Wodonga had dismissed an employee due to the breach of occupational and safety laws after an employee continually denied to wear safety glasses at work (Sloan, 2011). However, after checking the worker’s reinstatement, the Fair Work Australia stated that the worker had a family and he has found it challenging to

Open Document