Fair Value Accounting Case Study

730 Words2 Pages

The move towards fair-value accounting should be continued for many reasons. When comparing fair value, or market value, to historical cost, fair value gives a more relevant and updated view of what a particular asset or liability is truly worth. This promotes transparency of a company’s operations and gives stakeholders and potential investors an accurate look at the company’s worth. If assets and liabilities are sitting on the company’s books at historical value, this information can quickly become out-of-date. Fair value method of accounting also limits a company’s ability to lie about their income and make it look better than it actually is by using gains or losses from sales to increase or decrease net income. Since gains or losses …show more content…

The areas for additional disclosure include the valuation model (market, cost or income), statistical confidence intervals associated with certain valuation models, key assumptions including projection, sensitivity analyses depending on the selection of key assumptions and the entity’s position vs that of the entire market. Disclosing this additional information enables the reader of the financial statements to understand the method of fair value accounting for the specific company, which not only aids in their decision-making, but allows them to see how the company reaches the fair value estimates of their assets and …show more content…

Professional judgement is a necessary skill for preparers, auditors and regulators of financial statements to have. A professional accountant with good judgement will be able to serve the needs of businesses, the public and investors in the best way possible. Principle-based accounting will help preparers and auditors make and document significant accounting judgement. Guidance is also provided for regulators involved in assessing key judgements, and recommendations are made for standard setters in maintaining and producing principle-based standards which provide the scope for professional judgement. The framework is intended for different sized companies. The audit committees have a key role in challenging initial judgements. They speak to the auditors and make recommendations to approve key judgements. As business transactions become more complex, the validity and usefulness of financial reporting relies on good judgement to be made. We believe that a professional judgement reinforces the quality and integrity of the judgements made and also trust in the operation of principle-based financial

Open Document