Failure of the League in 1930s

843 Words2 Pages

Failure of the League in 1930s

There was self-interest in the league. The leading members were

Britain and France; the league depended on the whole mostly from these

two countries. But these two were not prepared to fight for the league

because if they fought for the league they were in risk of losing most

of their common interests. Like the crisis in Abyssinia where Britain

just let Mussolini pass the Suez Canal with no obstruction.

Economic sanctions didn't work because the main economic powers at the

time weren't part of the league. Examples are the Russia and the

U.S.A. the difference is that Russia at the end of the league it

became a member, but the U.S.A. never became a member congress vetoed

the decision to join the league. These were the biggest trade partners

of nearly all the countries that's why they were ineffective

Some of the treaties it had signed were seen harsh and unfair to many

nations. Most members were in the idea that the treaties need

amending. This further undermined the league.

Many countries like Russia, Germany and Japan were only member later

after the league had been founded or just had a very brief stay at the

league; unlike the worlds greatest power the U.S.A. was never a

member.

The league never had an army of its own. The league was condemned to

ask its members for an army and the only big armies at the time were

Britain and France that at the time were more interested in solving

their own domestic problems.

Decisions in the league were slow because of bureaucracy. Decision

took a lot o time because their had to be reports, complaints,

witnesses a lot of paper work for officials. An example of a slow

decision is the resolution of the Manchurian crisis, it took one year

to get a report from officials and after the report was made and told

to the world Japan continued to invade china. No one would dare even

try stooping them.

These are the main crisis in the 20s

Open Document