Fahrenheit 451 Rhetorical Analysis

617 Words2 Pages

A phoenix, in all of its scarlet glory, is thought to live for 500 hundred years before being consumed by fire and born again. Ray Bradbury, the author of Fahrenheit 451, demonstrates that the oppressing of information will backfire regardless of circumstance. Like a phoenix, the society that Bradbury created goes through a never ending cycle of creation and destruction. He asserts that the obstruction of knowledge through censorship in order to “protect” the public, will ultimately lead to violent consequences, therefore defeating its original purpose. In the first section of Fahrenheit 451, “The Hearth and the salamander,” Beatty- a fireman- explains to the protagonist Montag, the history of firemen and this the banning of most books. Beatty says that, “It didn’t come from the government down. There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship to start with, No! Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God. Today, thanks to them, you can stay happy all the time...,” (Page 58). In saying this Beatty explains that the oppression of knowledge came from the people to protect the …show more content…

Further along Granger tells Montag of a mythical bird. Granger says that, “There was a silly damn bird called phoenix back before Christ, every few hundred years he built a pyre and burnt himself up.... But every time he burnt himself up he sprang out of the ashes, he got himself born all over again,.” (Page 163). as Granger would later explain, the people of their country are like phoenix’s. Their towns burnt as a result of obstructing knowledge now leads them to seek the truth once more. The people of the book go through a never ending cycle of exploration, censorship, rebellion, and once again exploration. In doing so the Characters of Fahrenheit 451 needlessly use censorship regardless of the fact that no matter what they do, they always end up back where they started, making the whole process

Open Document