Explain what you understand by a literal interpretation of the Bible
The Christian faith follows stories, letters, and teachings of God and Jesus Christ. These teachings, miracles, letters, stories, and events are all recorded in different times, locations, and people (by Jesus’ apostles and eyewitnesses) – The Bible is considered to be a word for word dictation of God to the authors. Their recollections are all collected in one holy ancient book named the Bible. The Bible is split into two scripts - the Old Testament and the New Testament. God is represented in these ancient collection of books, showing who he is, how he speaks, and how he works – repairing the damages of his creation. His universal message is presented from the book of Genesis to the
…show more content…
The ‘literal’ interpretation method is used when interpreting the Bible. It is based on the idea that the passage is to be immediately understood, with a straightforward message and simply recounts significant events in the history of the making of Christianity. When using this method, it is when reading the bible exactly - it is reading it just as it is written, and only considering the ‘literal’ meaning from the stories in the Bible. Stories are read directly as they appear and meaning are taken from the meaning of the actual words and ‘literal’ techniques such as: translation, context, hyperbole, metaphor, analogy and genre are all discarded.
‘Literal’ interpretation of the Bible is occasionally related closely to fundamentalism. Literalism does not take into account the finer details of the passage, this includes the author, the purpose, when was it written, who were they writing it for etc. Also, ‘literal’ interpretation isn’t concerned with whether or not it will benefit modern society nor if it is relevant to modern society.
Use the literal method of interpretation of explain the meaning of the following passage- Luke
The Bible for many has several interpretations, and meanings. There is not one interpretation or meaning in which Christians all believe identically. Each part of the Bible has its own symbolic meaning to each faith, and their ways to interpret those meanings may differ from other Christians. In Having Words with God: The Bible as Conversation by Karl Allen Kuhn, Kuhn describes the Bible as a conversation between several and God. In this essay there will be a different approach to the same metaphor effect describing the Bible but, as a Pizza. The Bible is like a Pizza in the ways of having many toppings (topics) and layers (depths within the text), not to mention the types or styles just like there are many styles of scripture
...e to show that the bible isn’t historical fact but that they have deeper meanings behind the stories told. Some Catholics but not all recognize the truths; Literalists see the bible as historical fact. They ignore the meanings behind the stories; the meanings intended to be seen by the writers.
Chamberlain Charles. “Mesopotamian Background of The Hebrew Bible--Creation”. Making of The Modern World Program. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. January 7, 2011. Lecture.
N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an
The Hebrew Bible, better known as the Old Testament, is a collection of tomes that form part of the Biblical canon. Many scholars around the world do not think that a single author wrote the books contained in the Hebrew Bible, but rather that it represents centuries of stories frequently compiled after the events they describe . The stories were created with visions for the future, in order to allow audiences insight into communities and beliefs that were common thought during their era. The stories responded to the issues and problems of their time, but also addressed contemporary climates. While the stories themselves may not be true, they convey truth without needing literal readings. For example, the creation stories in Genesis, portray God as creating the universe, and while this is considered as not ‘literally true’; the stories communicate theological truths about mankind’s relationship with God through the eyes of Hebrew writers .
Harris, Stephen. Understanding The Bible. 6 ed. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2002. Print.
Variance of Bible Interpretations The Holy Bible holds a very important place in the history of the world due to its vast influence; which can be seen in multiple regions of the earth. “Although there are some cultures that do not live by the Bible, they have been directly and indirectly influenced by the power of government or people associated with scripture throughout time” (Dowd 7). Land, people and power have all been sacrificed in the pursuit of creating the correct interpretation of the Bible. Language and the social norms of a time period play a major role in the development of the biblical story that the general public will be able to read.
Authority of Scripture reconciles the community with God and can transform our lives. To participate in the fuller blessing of understanding, it is important to view Scripture with historical and literary sensitivity, interpret theocentrically, ecclesially, and contextually. I realize each of these can be overwhelming to the average person who is seeking direction for a specific concern in their life. Therefore, Migliore reminds us, interpreting Scripture is practical engagement in the living of Christian faith, love, and hope in a still redeemed world. When we listen carefully to the voices of the past, from a worldwide culture, and guided by the Holy Spirit, we will open ourselves to those transformational opportunities.
The authors acknowledge that many books have been written on this topic. Their goal is to be unique by focusing on different types of literature (genres) so their readers will understand how to properly interpret them in the context they were written. This review will examine the principles the authors use to interpret the Bible. The review will summarize the book, followed by a critique, and a conclusion.
In the first book of the Old Testament, Genesis, we read of the fall of man. As we study the Bible and recognize it’s importance in our lives today we must realize the role these stories play in our time. The Bible is not simply a history book or a book of stories of morality, but it is a book that speaks to us today of how we should live and interact with God. We are confronted with this fact in Genesis “through a graphic and dramatic representation it gives a
—. The Unity of the Bible: Exploring the Beauty and Structure of the Bible. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2003.
Levine, Amy –Jill and Douglas Knight. The Meaning of the Bible: What Jewish and Christian Old Testament Can Teach Us. New York: HarperOne, 2011
Thus, an effort is made to highlight how Bible interpretation – through its publication – has developed in the history of Christianity.
Answering these questions is the purpose of this essay. I begin by arguing that the Bible cannot be adequately understood independent of its historical context. I concede later that historical context alone however is insufficient, for the Bible is a living-breathing document as relevant to us today as it was the day it was scribed. I conclude we need both testimonies of God at work to fully appreciate how the Bible speaks to us.
A response to the interpretation of Acts 4:32–36 as an endorsement of a type of communal living as being normative for the Christian church.