Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bring out the significance of politeness in communication
Bring out the significance of politeness in communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Naturalistic Observation
Are females more polite than males? I am interested in obtaining the answer to this question, because as a child my sister and I have been taught that it is important to be polite to others, because when you are polite, you are treating people with respect. My parent’s logic for enforcing this principle as a success tool for life was formed in this question “why would someone want to help people who disrespect them?” As I thought about this, I agreed, however I have always been curious to see if the importance of being polite is equally important to both sexes? Or do females value the principle of being polite more so than males? To determine the answers to these questions, I will be observing how females and
…show more content…
I picked two specific behaviors considered polite which were door holding and saying please or thank you. Two behaviors were observed in order to do a comparative analysis in order to find out if women displayed polite behaviors in general more often than males, or if it depended upon the behavior itself whether or not males or females exhibited it more often. Door holding was defined as holding the door open long enough for the next person behind or in front of them to grab it in order to enter or exit the building. Observation for the behavior of door holding took place while sitting in Starbucks located in Russell House for one hour. The time was 10:40-11:40 a.m. Students were observed as they entered and exited the building and a tally was made next to the male or female category each time I witnessed a member of either gender hold open the door for the next person. If they failed to hold open the door for the next person a tally was made next to the “did not hold open the door” category next to their gender on the appropriate table. Observation for the use of the words please and thank you was conducted in Gibbes dining hall while sitting next to the registers as students paid for their food. Each time a student said please when making a request, or thank you upon receiving their food a tally was made next to the appropriate gender category. Likewise if they did not …show more content…
Not holding open doors was rare, however females tended to do so a little more frequently. When it came to saying please and thank you, the roles were reversed and males tended to say it less frequently than females. Therefore my hypothesis was incorrect. Which gender displayed a polite behavior more often was dependent upon which behavior was being observed, which means that females are not necessarily more likely to display polite behaviors more frequently than males. Starbucks allowed me to obtain more data because I observed at a busier time and more people came in thereby giving me a larger sample. I frequently witnessed most males checking behind themselves to see if someone was behind them before they let the door close. My results could be contributed to culture and societal expectations. Men are expected to hold open doors more so than females as a sign of being a gentleman. A few details in my observation that could be improved would be my observation time in Gibbes and to take into consideration that one gender might be more likely to come into a certain location more than the other which could skew my results in their favor. I observed in Gibbes dining hall later in the night when they were not very busy which caused me to not be able to collect as much data. Also more females came into Starbucks during the time I observed there which could have potentially effected my results had enough males not came
Women communicate to establish or maintain relationships. They talk longer than men and spend more time on one subject to fully understand where each person is coming from. This is evident in the use of nonverbal cues to further build a connection, like touching one’s arm or engaging their audience by nodding. Women also use more emotional language than men, apparent in the compassionate, warm, and concerned word choice that women use. Clearly there are great differences in gender communication. One could argue it is the greatest difference between men and
According to Mills (2005), the relation between gender and impoliteness is important because it is the way that the participants view their gender identity and the way that they think others will judge them. In her study, Mills (2003) argues that women are more polite than men because they are expected to speak and act in a certain way in our society. On the other hand, she argues that men regard the world as a battlefield in which they tend to attack in order to achieve something or maintain their social status. Aydınoğlu (2013) conducted a study to find out if there were any gender differences when participants were presented with a scenario that showed impolite acts. In this study, participants were divided into two groups. Participants in the first group were given scenarios that showed impolite acts such as insults, threats and disapproval. In the second group, participants were given scenarios were impoliteness was showed in a form of sarcasm, teasing and complains. The results of this study concluded that men responded to impoliteness more offensively when they were shown acts of insults, threats and disapproval, while the women reflected more on the passive roles showed in the
Unfortunately, many lack tact and dive into things head first without providing a foundation for the reader to stand upon. The excitement to begin imparting all they have learned is endearing but ultimately, it is poor strategy. In order to understand anything regarding naturalistic observation and its research value, one must first understand the practice itself; both humans and animals can be subjected to naturalistic observation. The logistical issues tend to be availability of participants, ensuring that their privacy is respected, and whether the observations will be performed where the observer can be seen. Both approaches are used in animal and human naturalistic observation research. Being hidden, researchers are confident that those observed are not acting differently because they are being observed. This method effectively reduces or removes any chance of reactivity and this is goal, ensuring validity by allowing the subject to act in its most authentic nature without the interference of an outside force. Though this is ideal, there are times when observers cannot hide, and in those instances they must collect data over a long enough period to deduce whether or not their presence is affecting the actions of their research subjects. Privacy concerns greatly limit the use of naturalistic observation to places that are generally accessible to the public in the context of human observation but not chimpanzee, so the subject greatly effects the methodology.
"Ways That Males and Females Are Treated Differently." Mills College: Personal Pages Directory. Web. 20 Mar. 2011. .
For less than two hours, I observed the grandson of a visitor at my aunt’s home.
When it comes to the effects of gender on language development, one of the most frequently asked questions is: do males and females develop language differently? Studies have shown both similarities and differences between male and female language development. Apel and Masterson (2001) explain that both genders acquire language skills along the same timeline and that both become active, engaging conversationalists. Although research has shown both similarities and differences in language development, pertaining to gender, a major influencing factor has come from parents. Observations have shown that during the different stages of language development, parents tend to use different types of language with males than with females, which continually affect an individual throughout his or her entire life.
Communication between males and females has always been somewhat complicated. Because we are arguing that males and females have different cultures we wanted to take a look at what some of these differences might be. According to our research the inherent differences between male and female culture are the different roles that society holds for them and the ways these roles lead to different communication styles. The stereotypes that men and women grow up with affect the types of ways in which they communicate. We first wanted to take a look at how they specifically differ while men and women are arguing or having normal conversations. We also looked at the different types of networks that men and women share. These networks also differ and as do the reasonings for their formation. Although we do not think that men and women need to change their cultures to effectively communicate, we do think that better communication is possible. One of the researchers we took a look at was Deborah Tannen. According to Tannen the reason that men and women do not communicate well is that men and women use language differently. Women take the attitude that conversation is to explore solutions to common problems while men concern themselves more with getting information and hard data from conversation. Tannen states that what women look for in communication is human connection, while men consider status to be most important. They are looking for independence and are constantly looking for higher accomplishments. Intimacy threatens this independence, so men have a tendency to avoid it. One of the old sayings about women is that they talk more than men. It turns out that it is not necessarily true. Women seem to talk more in private conversations than do men. Women do not generally have a fear of intimacy and therefore are much more open with one another during private conversations. It is more difficult for women to use this type of communication style in the public arena. In that case it is men that do most of the talking. Tannen ultimately argues that men use communication as a weapon. They use long explanations to command attention from who it is they are speaking to. They use it to convey information and to ultimately gain agreement. Tannen suggests that through even simple conversation men are continually protecting their status. She sugg...
While analyzing the results, researchers wanted to determine if any responses between men, women and the children were different. The adult women tended to be more hesitant when participating and had experienced less eye contact with the Westerner than men did. There were
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
According to Eagley, Wood, and Fishbaugh (1981), women are more concerned than men about the quality of interpersonal relationships. Women take greater responsibility for establishing and maintaining interpersonal bonds, whereas men do not. Also, women are more empathetic and more accurate at decoding nonverbal communication than males. Male gender roles also claim that men should remain independent and not agree closely with others, while it is seen as acceptable for women to conform to group behaviors.
Naturalistic observation is a way of observing applicants in their own natural environment without the contestants realizing the observers are present. My observation took me to different places and settings to complete my assignment where I observed the subjects’ reactions and further relate it with concepts of psychology. This assignment is going to look into the observation at different settings by watching people as they go about their normal activities in their own habitats, and will briefly describe the concepts of superego, egocentrism, operant conditioning, pretend play, and lack of conservation. These concepts are common between the ages 4-6 years of age. The paper will also analyze the interactions using a reflective approach on the psychology of young children.
...o exchanging information and communicating. We can find much more causes, examples and cases in our everyday life. Of course, these sex differences are statistical average, and many men and women do not fit these profiles. As we can learn from many social and psychological researchers, there is no one biological or cultural/environmental explanation for the miscommunication between males and females. The explanation is a complex one, it involves the two aspects, and sex is not the only variable that effects our miscommunication in life. Knowing the main differences between men and women in communications can help us communicate better with others, and especially with the other sex.
For example, according to writers Daniel N. Maltz and Ruth A Borker of A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Communication, when people of the opposite gender have a conversation men are more “likely to interrupt the speech of their conversation partner”(170). While females are more likely to, “adopt a strategy of “silent protest” after they have been interrupted” (170). According to Maltz and Borker, men’s dominance in conversation goes along with their dominance in society. In society men, typically, are seen as the more dominant gender over women (170). This also applies to inside the classroom as more men tend to speak out and do more of the talking than women. Most of the time teachers view interaction and participation as a very important part of their student’s ability to succee...
Men and women are more different than one can imagine. Though the main difference is in physical appearance, another difference is their sense of communication. Women appear to talk more than males, but like to keep their conversations more private. Males, on the other hand, will talk less, but do not mind their conversations being more public. This is just one of many examples of men and women being completely opposite of one another in terms of communication. Each gender has their own expectations of the opposite. These expectations are not usually met due to communication differences, which leads to criticisms such as, “Men do not listen” or “Women will never understand” to form. The most common assumption for why expectations are not met
The purpose of this study was to explore the impact abiding by gender norms has on the amount of prosocial behavior that is shown towards an individual or group. This is important because in society, many people do not strictly adhere to dressing in gender norms. Specifically, girls do not always dress in a feminine manner (i.e. long hair, make up, form accentuating nkvariable in this study is helping behavior shown towards people who overtly exemplify gender norms in their clothing compared to when they are dressed more androgynously. The conceptual dependent variable is the frequency those involved in the study are willing to engage in helping behavior. The hypothesis of this study is that most people will agree to help, as the task is not difficult nor time consuming, however, it is hypothesized that when the confederates of the study are dressed in more androgynous clothing, people will be more hesitant to help than when they are dressed in a more feminine way. As shown in the study by Tarrant, Dazeley and Cottom (2009), people are more inclined to show helping behavior towards someone in their in-group compared to someone in the out-group. This study also shows that if it is seen positively by the in-group to show empathy towards people in the out-group, this will increase the amount of empathy shown. For this experiment, the experimenters made themselves appear to be part of the out-group by appearing careless and not dressing by gender norms, however, it is often seen in a negative light to not take someone’s picture, which is why only hesitation, not complete rejection was anticipated.