Examples Of Duality Of Man In A Tale Of Two Cities

1045 Words3 Pages

The Duality of Man
With their weapons and their suffering state, Charles Dickens, in the novel A Tale of Two Cities, shows the two sides of a revenge-driven and poor peasant life. Charles Dickens did not always have a good life, but he knew what was right and wrong. His family went through a number of troubles related to debt, but his struggle never led him to violence. In the beginning of the novel, Charles Dickens showed off the peasants as victims of circumstance, but as the plot rolled out, their villainy was shown and Dickens began to show them as the rats who had decided to bite back once they were pushed too far in a corner.
In both fictional literature and the real world, humans are told to believe that good will always triumph over …show more content…

The line can be interpreted as many things, but the most striking meanings are the two very different lives that the two classes of people live in. The meanings lead into each other during the book. For the peasants, it was a period of great struggle and sacrifice, but for the nobles, it was a breezy era. The line later means that it was the best of times for the peasants, who were finally striking back against those who had squashed them like ants who were only trying to live life without too much pain. Their revenge meant that the nobles would be slaughtered in a way that would send fear into the hearts of even the purest of imperial Frenchmen. The changing of the meaning in the book is to show that Dickens felt bad for the bumpkin struggle, but did not agree with the punishment of death that the wealthy and their families were struck down with. The first instance of fully inhumane abuse the peasants were subjected to was the death of a young child. Dickens writes in “Monseigneur in Town”, “He threw out a gold coin for the valet to pick up, and all the heads craned forward that all the eyes might look down at it as it fell. The tall man called out again with a most unearthly cry, ‘Dead!’” (Dickens X) The death of the child at the hands of the Marquis in the chapter “Monseigneur in Town” darkly parallels the …show more content…

While the only true evil nobles are the Marquis line and the older Evremondes, poor folk like Madame Defarge, The Vengeance, the Jaques, and the women who rioted down the streets are littered everywhere throughout the novel. Their actions, like ripping people apart, putting people underneath the blade of the guillotine, and stuffing people with grass, are more feral and uncaring than the type of evil that most nobles live in. Along with this, the scene where the wine is spewed onto the ground foreshadows that the humanity of the peasants goes out the window at the sight of something rare that they might be able to get. The fact that a man writes “blood” with the wine pounds this in further. Many nobles who live in excess do it without even realizing they do. Monseigneur lives a posh lifestyle, but it is all he knows. Charles Darnay, a noble who is highlighted in the book, treats his peers kindly and fairly. Even though he is an Evremonde, he shows that a noble does not have to be like their blue blood would suggest. The fact that more peasants were written to be out of their minds in the middle and latter thirds of the book shows that Dickens’s opinion was really slanted to the peasants being the real terrors from the

Open Document