Evil In Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

895 Words2 Pages

The novel Lord of the Flies endeavors to showcase the human nature as to inherit evil from within, Golding’s philosophy of evil is sculpted by the character, setting and the beast in the story. It is shown that the inner nefariousness is unleashed when a man does not have discipline and civilization in his life. The vile wickedness to kill, fight, hunt and to do everything which the boys could not even think about when they landed, came from the evil, lingering within them, that popped out when they found out the mask which protected them. Golding, deliberately puts the boys on an island where there is no one to harm or hurt them, to exhibit that the boys evolved from being civilized too evil, due to nothing but the inner anxiety and rivalry. …show more content…

Despite this, towards the conclusion Golding unfolds a monstrous, savage, and hostile, Jack coming forward. Ralph blames Jack of being "a beast and a swine and a bloody, bloody thief!"(Golding 204), this emphatic statement recapitulates what Jack has turned into. To add on, Roger who “picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry- threw it to miss” (Golding 66) in the beginning, had killed Piggy “with a sense of delirious abandonment” (Golding 205), using a rock in the end. This subtle irony, irrefutably exhibit the demonic behavior. The change in character over a due course of time proves Golding’s point, that all living beings surrender to the dark inside them when the civilized world is stripped off them. Golding subtly uses diction to fortify the theme of man’s capacity of corruption through the innate human psyche, as well as its influence on the most sophisticated children. The quote “kill the beast! cut his throat! Spill the blood” (Golding 171) is chanted to express rage, savagery and the blood thirst in the boys. This phrase is vital demonstration of the evil enunciation used by Golding. In spite being sung by young boys, this zealous assertion carries vice and blood …show more content…

When the boys were sophisticated, they didn’t fear the beast; “there isn’t a beastie” (Golding 36), and they even consoled the littleuns who were startled by the illusions of the island, “I’ve been all over the island. By myself. If there were a beast I’d have seen it…. there is no beast in the island” (Golding 90). However, as the violence and corruption started to rise, during the climax, the biguns started to convince themselves that "'Maybe there is a beast.... maybe it's only us.'"(Golding 96), this phrase is a fervent double entendre, its conveys that the fear is driven by the evil is inside humanity. Moreover, as the book heads towards the end, the boys create the fear into their major priority, struggling to fight with it; they offer a pig’s head to the beast, “Jack held up the head and jammed the soft throat down the pointed end of the stick which pierced through the mouth……’this head is for the beast. It’s a gift’” (Golding 154), Jack’s action stich the ruthless anger built by the devil, and outrageous delusion of the fear of the beast. The Lord of the flies perplexes and torments Simon when he tells him the truth, it asks a rhetorical question Simon, “"You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close! I'm the reason why it's

Open Document