Everyday Use By Alice Walker Analysis

1371 Words3 Pages

Our identity is our most valuable treasure. It defines who we are. Sometimes we get confuse by events that happen in our life that makes us think about who we are. Alice Walker demonstrates in her short story “Everyday Use” the conflict of identity, using the setting and irony to explore the confusion and poor self-esteem of the characters, and how they can affect the identity of a person.
The setting which in this short story is the quilts. This short story focuses on the bonds between women of different generations and their legacy. The quilts symbolize this legacy. The connection between generations is high, but the lack of understanding of Dee’s history shows that those bonds are vulnerable. Dee does not understand the significance of …show more content…

Confusion plays a significant role in Alice Walker short story Everyday Use. In this topic, we can see how each one understands his present life concerning the traditions of his people and culture. The matter of Dee’s name is an excellent example of confusion towards her heritage. Dee decided to change her name for a new one. The new name she chose was Wangero Leewanika Kemanjo. The goal of this new name was to support her African ancestors and to back up the oppression implied by taking an American name being a black slave. The mother explains that the name Dee is kind of symbolic to her: “you know as well as me you was named after your aunt Dicie” (28). The mother could trace it back to the time of the Civil War (32). To the mother, this name is significant because it belonged to a particular beloved individual. Dee chooses an African name that better represent her family heritage. She does not realize that by doing this, she is separating from her family. Changing her name is not the only example of confusion in Dee. Dee is confused about the meaning of her heritage, and we can see it in her attitude towards the quilts and other household items. Dee admires the old handmade goods made by her ancestors; such as the hand-carved benches made for the table because the family could not afford to buy chairs. It never comes to Dee’s mind to think that these objects could be seen as symbols of oppression because her family made them since they could not afford to buy them. Dee desires the family quilts, but she sees them just as artifacts suitable for display. Dee does not have any plan to use them for their intended purpose of everyday use. For Dee, the objects are strictly aesthetic. It seems that her admiration reflects a cultural trend of valuing handmade objects, without any sincere interest in her heritage. We can back up this with the fact that she was

Open Document