Ethical Issues In Predictive Genetic Testing

Genetic Testing Genetic testing is defined as examining ones DNA. This test can reveal changes or anomalies that may cause illness or disease; this is according to the Mayo Clinic. Genetic testing has been around for quite some time although it’s only been approved for the testing of certain diseases. There are three forms of genetic testing, carrier, diagnostic and genetic testing. According to the Journal of Medical Ethics, diagnostic testing is looking into whether there’s a disease in the body/embryo and how far the disease has progressed. This diagnostic process is usually done in embryos and babies. The way we know about a certain gene or trait that would adversely affect the baby is by using the carrier test. There’s also predictive

Genetic information is private and is directly related to the individual’s identity”. Genetic testing can be crucial in decisions taken by an individual especially if the test was accurate about any disease, directly affecting any family members including brother, sister or even extended family. For example, when a person gets a genetic test, the very first test will be a chromosomal test. This test will look at he structure of the chromosomes, it will also look at the length, the way they are arranged within the nucleus and finally if it is is in it’s proper location. A chromosomal test would be used to determine if a newborn has Down syndrome, since an extra chromosome is present, this test would identify the

First, “ Utilitarians believe moral decisions should be decided by calculating a burden/benefit ratio from a societal viewpoint. This perspective promotes the good of society over that of individual”(Fulda, Lykens). If a patient gets genetically tested, the utilitarian perspective says that we should take into account the multiple people involved with the patient, thus letting them know about the results of the test. When family is told about certain risks that have been identified through genetic testing, there are many aspects that could be mitigated better. The Journal of Medical Ethics also expresses that when family members are told about genetic testing and how they are affected, the intensity of pain is minimized through medical intervention. Utilitarian view also backs up the idea that when individuals are tested, it gives them a way to decide and make decisions on issues that affects their family. It also can help two people on bringing a child to the world that could potentially ruin them in a financial sense since money would need to be allocated for the child’s care. This view allows for more testing on chronic diseases and potentially fatal