Ethical Dilemmas In The Road By Cormac Mccarthy

1581 Words4 Pages

The Road by Cormac McCarthy is a tale of survival in a dangerous life after war scenario. In this new world things such as morality are almost nonexistent. There are no longer government agencies, such as the police, to inforce the laws. This lead to people choosing to always make the bad decision over the moral option such as robbing someone for their supplies, or murdering someone so they could use them as a food source. The father fell into the category of doing whatever it takes to survive, where he killed and robbed people. The boy on the other hand is always the one who is urging them to do whatever is the ethical choice. The father and son’s voyage across McCarthy’s post-apocalyptic wasteland, the boy emerges as the pure “good guy” because …show more content…

According to Stephanie Bowman, “The father continues showing us how he sacrifices others as well as a bit of his morals, for his son’s welfare.” When it comes to his son’s safety, nothing else matters which leads to him doing bad things that hurts the son more mentally than physically. No matter the situation, even when it came to the chance to get food to fulfill their hunger, the father would be cautious and tell them they could not eat some of the things they found, such as a can of tomatoes that “Someone before him had not trusted them and in the end neither did he” (McCarthy 22). The boy and the father were both starving, but they did not eat the food they had found because whoever raided the house before did not trust it so the man would not take the chance of not keeping his son safe to fill their needs. There are other times throughout the novel that the father does the non-honorable thing so that they do in fact eat. The boy made the father promise the son that they would not kill and eat the dog that had been following them, but the father broke that promise and “tried to coax it to come but it would not. I made a noose of wire to catch it” (McCarthy 87). Although the father had promised not to kill the dog, and knew killing the dog was not a very “good” thing to do, he did it anyways to survive and get food in his son’s stomach to keep them moving forward. In Cormac McCarthy’s terrible wasteland creation, the father does what he need to do to survive and keep his son safe no matter what morality repercussions it brings upon

Open Document