Thomas King Humor

1617 Words4 Pages

Comedy is an important aspect in Thomas King’s short story, “A Short History of Indians in Canada”, as well as Ernest Hemingway’s short story, “A Clean, Well-Lighted Place.” The differing purposes of humour in these two short stories are what separates them in terms of the effect comedy has on the writing. Thomas King integrates satire, a form of humourous ridicule, to convey the inability of the Native population to adapt to white civilization and the demeaning, yet normal opinion that the white men have regarding this issue. Similarly, Jennifer Wallace’s article, “Tragedy and Laughter” contributes to King’s comedic strategy, as she acknowledges that a serious matter can be presented in an amusing way that allows the audience to gain perspective …show more content…

Despite this comical feature, a sense of depression, involving both the older waiter and the drunk old man, is what comes to the forefront in this occasion. While King uses humour as the foundation of his engaging message, Hemingway uses it to candidly juxtapose the state of mind of the older waiter. He uses casually dismissive phrases such as “No, hombre, only to make a joke.” (Hemingway 110) and listens to rude comments from the younger waiter, such as “You should have killed yourself last week” (Hemingway 108) with little concern. However, the apparent shallowness of the two waiters’ conversation brings upon concern in the mental well-being of the older waiter, since the dialogue fails to entertain as much as it does inform the audience of the increasingly doubtful attitude that the man has towards the meaning of life. His lack of motive and strange observations towards the end of the discussion, including “Each night I am reluctant to close up because there may be someone who needs the café” (Hemingway 110) reveal that he actually does not have a careless, indifferent outlook like the younger waiter, and that he is truly pondering what life really has to offer him besides staying in a café all day and night. Consequently, the story loses its amusing …show more content…

King’s oddly comical idiom, “The live ones we tag, says Bill. Take them to the shelter. Nurse them back to health. Release them in the wild,” (205) expresses the savage animal metaphor that is satirically maintained throughout the story. This paternalistic attitude shows that the white population have taken their power to heart and feel that they must help these seemingly inferior people to a certain degree. Ironically, it was the white people who caused this instability among the Native people, so this form of care they are exhibiting isn’t genuine, but rather a way to remove them from the city hastily without acknowledging the reasons for the Natives’ struggle to adapt to white culture. The onomatopoetic word, “Whup!” is used numerous times, likely to make a laughable mockery of battle cries or savage noises, which is another delicate way that the white men characterize the Natives as being animal-like. As the comic effect finally dwindles down in the final words of the story, the observation, “In the old days, when they came through, they would black out the entire sky” (King 205) reveals that this bizarre tale has a telltale meaning, as Canadian society has not fixed this problem by just separating much of the Native population from white society. The humour makes readers ponder why this absurd state of mind

Open Document