Essay On The Four Canonical Gospels

1146 Words3 Pages

The Passion Assignment The purpose of this assignment is to compare the canonical Gospels to the move Passion of the Christ by Mel Gibson. In order to complete the assignment I will use Kurt Aland’s Synopsis of the Four Gospels and will view the passion scene in Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ. The content of this report will include a comparison of the four canonical Gospels. This will show what all four Gospels agree on. Next I will discuss five differences found in the canonical Gospels. After showing how the Gospels are alike and how they are different I will discuss two details in the canonical Gospel’s that was not included in Mel Gibson’s film. Following the discussion of the omissions I will discuss three details Mel Gibson showed in his movie that were not found in the canonical Gospels. Lastly I plan to discuss how the conflations of the four canonical Gospels in Mel Gibson’s film help to understand the canonical Gospels. When you begin to read the Canonical Gospels you will notice that they all do agree on some things. The first point they agree on is that Jesus was taken to a place called Golgotha, which means place of a skull or the skull (Matt 27:33-37; Mark 15:22-26; Luke 23:33-34; John 19:17b-27). The Gospels agree also that Golgotha is the place where the crucifixion …show more content…

The story of Jesus’ crucifixion is a very complicated topic and has been told by many people over time. This can lead to the similarities and differences that we see between the four Canonical Gospels. But even with all the differences the four Canonical Gospels agree on the major point that Jesus was crucified and died on the cross. So I believe that it doesn’t matter which Gospel you study, be it Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John, you will still end up with the same big picture. However, it does help to see a conflated version of the Gospels to see the little details as one larger piece of

More about Essay On The Four Canonical Gospels

Open Document