Essay On The Factors Of The Canadian War

857 Words2 Pages

Canadian War-Promoting Factors 1. Military Skill and Bravery Despite Poor Leadership
Canadian commanders have sometimes provided poor leadership, but the most deadly source has been commanders from our patron nations. Canadian forces have been subject to dreadful foreign command decisions beginning with the Boer War, in which the British had no idea of how to engage in unconventional warfare; the almost criminal leadership of General Douglas Haig and others in the Great War; the deadly experimental raid at Dieppe and the Hong Kong debacle in World War II; the arrogance of American General Douglas MacArthur and the ineptitude of American politicians in Korea. The pattern continued with a senseless trickle of deaths brought on by misguided …show more content…

That we appreciate public praise from nations that are older and more powerful is quite understandable. But the story of Canada’s wars is a story of sacrificing far too much for that praise. More than once, when Canada had no important interest at stake, she has allowed herself to be led along by superficial accolades.
Particularly in World War II, when at a turning point on the issue of a truly independent identity, Canada deferred too often to the decisions of patrons. We will see times when Canada did assert herself, but the human cost of the times she did not has been staggering. That cost is not only measured in dead and wounded. Canada has also deferred to the questionable moral and ethical decisions of others.
These two Canadian war-promoting factors are, of course, related. After all, it was real skill and bravery that our patrons were praising. And as they strove to keep Canada onside, they might have been motivated to be even more effusive by the knowledge that their commanders had often led poorly. Nevertheless, at difficult points in the transition of dominance from the British to the Americans, it was not the responsibility of these patrons to assess the proper role of Canada. It was, and is solely a Canadian responsibility. The record on that is far from perfect. We will see Dieppe as but one example of a longing for recognition that prompted a campaign for Canada to be a player in any operation conceived by her patrons, at any …show more content…

Reluctant Participation
Either we have simply learned some lessons from participating in other people’s wars, or there really is something in the Canadian national character that is unenthusiastic about war. Whatever the reason, Canada has never been an eager war maker. This has been true even though the war-promoting factors, especially propaganda, have moved the public to support them enthusiastically at times, at least until things started to go badly.
If our reluctance to participate is a characteristic, it has been reflected over decades in the personalities of prime ministers. In the heyday of imperialism, Wilfrid Laurier would not spend public money for the Boer War. While the ties to Britain were still strong, he sought compromises to limit our involvement in the Great War. Even his Tory successor, Robert Borden, initially sought to provide only naval support. More importantly, Borden began to learn. Though he eventually led Canada into the war, after the slaughter at Passchendaele he is said to have warned the British not to count on us in the future. After the war, he worked for disarmament and in support of the League of Nations. William Lyon Mackenzie King was openly reluctant to take us into World War II. It was in no small measure due to the personalities of Lester Pearson, Pierre Trudeau, and Jean Chretien that Canada was spared the futile blood baths of Vietnam and

Open Document