Essay On Social Groups In 1984

464 Words1 Page

In 1984, there are multiple different social groups. They are each represented in a particular way to better understand why they are there. In 1984, there are three main social groups represented. There are the Inner Party members, Outer Party members, and the proles. Each are key to the story and without them, 1984 wouldn’t have worked out as well.

The Inner Party is a group apart of the Party, and are higher up than the regular Outer Party members. They are able to do things such as turn off telescreens and access things that regular Outer Party members can’t. “Quote” Inner Party members do not play the highest role on the social hierarchy in 1984, but are more powerful than the rest. Outer Party members play the role as “middle class” on the social hierarchy in 1984. Inner Party members aren’t quite the lowest on the hierarchy, but are very close. They are treated badly and are under the false impression of being superior.

The proles are to be considered the very lowest on the social hierarchy. The are the worst treated citizens of Oceania. Even though they have the most population out of all of Oceania, they still haven’t overthrown or even tried to overthrow the government. Although the proles are considered not to be brainwashed, …show more content…

The Inner Party members are important because without them, the hierarchy wouldn’t have worked. You can’t go from the best (Big Brother), to the proles.There needs to be that some sort of middle group. Same with the Outer Party members. They are there in the story to play the lower class, but not the absolute lowest. The proles are the final level on the hierarchy and they are extremely important to 1984. If they weren’t there, having the Party would be pointless. The Party members would not have that false feeling of being superior and it would really not matter if you were a Party member or not. “Quote”. There would be no other groups, so why feel

Open Document