Essay On Self Ownership

918 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Equality and fairness

Robert Nozick’s principle of self-ownership states that individuals have ownership over their body. Owning one’s own self is a natural right that each individual has. A person has the exclusive right to make decisions regarding what their body does and does not do. The self is the body itself but also the labor and talents of an individual and by extension, the results of it. Because a person has rights over the self they at are full liberty to choose what happens with the body and the elements that the body possesses. This places constraints on the way others can treat and interact with each person. Since you are the only one with rights to yourself, another person cannot make you do anything against your will, even if it is for a good purpose. This means you cannot be made a slave or be forced to give up any part of your self without your consent. Under Nozick’s principle of self-ownership things such as taxation, social services and various government regulations are immoral.
John Rawls’ idea of fairness means that every thing that each individual contributes to society will be divided amongst everyone. The basic structure of society will not work unless everyone cooperates. Rawls’ principle of justice as fairness has both a negative and positive side. The negative part of this is that some people are born disadvantage or do not have a choice in the disadvantages that they have within society. But these negative disadvantages should not mean that a person be disadvantaged in society for life or be excluded from the benefits of social institutions. Rawls idea of justice does not specifically say how things should be distributed amongst people but it does say that there should be equal distribution.
There are two principles of j...

... middle of paper ...

...refers to as the veil of ignorance. This veil is essentially a metaphor for pulling a veil over people and society’s eyes. He applies it in the way that the individual person would not know their place in society and make decisions based upon this ignorance. It also helps determine if this action or decision is moral. It does this by not giving each person the knowledge of their social or political standing, forcing them to make a decision in favor of the group or people it would benefit positively the most. They would make this choice because hypothetically it could be them in the less ideal situation. Therefore a rational society would select policies and arrangements that benefitted the lower parts of society. This veil of ignorance almost ensures that the needs and demands of the minorities in society are represented and there is political order and fairness.

Show More
Related

  • John Rawls On Justice Analysis

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why does it matter? Why do humans harp on the topics of justice and equality consistently? The answers to above mentioned questions aren’t easy to formulate, and they open up a door to greater questions about morality, humanity and so forth. Humans live in a cooperative society. The aim of this body of organization is to advance as a whole and individually simultaneously. John Rawls’ states this goal of human society in Distributive Justice published in 1979: “We may think of the human society as a more or less self-sufficient association regulated by a common conception of justice and aimed at advancing the good of its members.” Hence, our society is shaped by an idea of justice – one that is applicable to all members of this society, and this set conception of justice promotes the advancement of the society and the individuals living in

    Read More

  • W. E. B. Dubois Living Behind The Veil Summary

    637 Words  | 2 Pages

    The veil mentioned in the book serves as a dark shadow which represents being shut out of the world, it also serves as a mask concealing contempt. It was within this veil that Blacks experienced oppression “Then it dawned upon me with a certain sadness that I was different from the others; …shut out from the world by a vast veil. I had no desire to tear down that veil, to creep through; I held all beyond it” (2) In the first essay Dubois describes his realization of the veil, in this he realized the troubles he would face because of his skin color. He noticed that those who were unveiled lived lives with “dazzling opportunities” which he longed to have.

    Read More

  • The Theme of the Veil in W.E.B. Du Bois' Souls of Black Folk

    2922 Words  | 6 Pages

    "For now we see through a glass, darkly" --Isiah 25:7 W.E.B. Du Bois's Souls of Black Folk, a collection of autobiographical and historical essays contains many themes. There is the theme of souls and their attainment of consciousness, the theme of double consciousness and the duality and bifurcation of black life and culture; but one of the most striking themes is that of "the veil. " The veil provides a link between the 14 seemingly unconnected essays that make up The Souls of Black Folk. Mentioned at least once in most of the 14 essays it means that, "the Negro is a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second sight in this American world, -a world with yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world. It is a peculiar sensation, this double consciousness, this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Ownership And The Sense Of Self And Identity

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is one sad existence, to live and die, without discovering, what could have been. The question is often asked, what is the meaning of life? Or even, what is the purpose? There is no clear answer, and yet there is a search in every moment, every breath, and every corner, for a minute hint. In a societal setting, identity is merely determined by the amount of tangible things owned. Society places the ideology on individuals that those who own the most tangible things are above others. An individual can trump all those societal values by owning the self. This brings equality to all, and levels the playing field. This has been true throughout history, however behind all of this, there are individuals learning to conquer themselves. It begs the question, what defines a person, the physical or the metaphysical? There is obviously a compelling relationship between ownership and the sense of self or identity. But, is it ownership that determines the sense of self or is it perhaps, that the sense of self determines ownership. The

    Read More

  • John Rawls on Justice

    1425 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Rawls divided up his theory into four distinct parts; the first part consisted of his belief of primary goods, next is the formation of principles of justice, third is the institutionalization of society, and finally the last part of his theory is the actual workings within society . The general concept of Rawls’s theory is, “all primary goods must be distributed equally unless the unequal distribution of any of these goods is to the advantage of the least favored” . In order to analyze this correctly Rawls’ terms must be defined; according to Rawls a primary good are “things that every rational man is presumed to want. Goods normally have use regardless of a person’s rational plan to life is” . Some examples of a primary good are: basic rights, opportunity, and income to name a few. With the unders...

    Read More

  • Rawls Principles Of Justice Essay

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rawls states that you cannot reimburse for the sufferings of the distressed by enhancing the joys of the successful. Fairness according to him occurs when the society makes sure that every individual is treated equally before the law and given a c...

    Read More

  • Rawls Theory Of Justice

    3346 Words  | 7 Pages

    INTRODUCTION John Rawls most famous work, A Theory of Justice, deals with a complex system of rules and principles. It introduces principles of justice to the world, principles which Rawls argues, are meant to create and strengthen equality while removing the inequality which exists within society. These principles are both meant as standalone laws and regulations, but they can be joined as well. The main function of the first principle is to ensure the liberty of every individual, while the second principle is meant to be the force for the removal of inequality through what Rawls calls distributive justice. I will begin this paper by making clear that this is a critique of Rawls and his principle of difference and not an attempt at a neutral analysis.

    Read More

  • John Rawls: “Original Position”

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    Out of this experiment Rawls provides us with two basic principles of rules of: 1) every person should have equal opportunity to access a justice system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all and; 2) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both; a) to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged offices and b) positions opportunities should be made available to all under fair and equality conditions (242).... ... middle of paper ... ... I would opt against some other economic society, not knowing whether or not it would satisfy the conditions of providing the best opportunity for the least in my society.

    Read More

  • Theory Of Justice In John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Rawls’ Theory of Justice attempts to establish a fair and reasonable social account of social justice. To do this, he discusses two fundamental principles of justice, which if implemented into society, would guarantee a just and fair way of life. Rawls is mostly concerned with the social good (what is good and just), and his aim with the Theory of Justice is to provide a way that society could be one that is fair and just, while taking into consideration, a person’s primary goods (rights and liberties, opportunities, income and wealth, and the social bases of self-respect). The usage of these principles will lead to an acceptable basis of self-respect. That saying, if the two principles are fair and just, then the final primary good,

    Read More

  • Durkheim and DuBois, Both Non-Rational and Collective Thinkers

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Concept of the veil has been a significant symbol of clearly differentiating from the whites, in aspects of political, economical and social prospects. Durkheim explained symbol as “something that stands for something else”(pg. 135). It is a symbol that calls up shared notions and values. In the example of the Blacks in the south, the veil symbolized an “iron curtain” separating the two races, separation and invisibility, of the black and white. The veil had previously been worn because of previous traditions demanding a clear separation of the sexes. The veil is seen as a social barrier to prevent the “others”, black African Americans, from surpassing into the clean and pure white world. Nonetheless Du bois also states, that its possible for one to, lift up the veil when one wishes, and he can also exist in a region on neither side, white nor black, which shows Du bois’ many different meaning and function with the symbol of the veil.

    Read More

  • Reciprocity and Justice: Exploring Rawls' Difference Principle

    1225 Words  | 3 Pages

    He goes on to illustrate this by creating the Wilt Chamberlain principle, the point of the example was to demonstrate what Nozick thinks, is wrong with patterned theories of justice such as that of Rawls. He has you suppose that you live in a society where the distribution of wealth is fair. And you got tickets to watch Chamberlin play, and right at the entrance there is a box asking for voluntary contribution of twenty-five cents to be given to the player because so many go and watch him play. The people can choose to put or not put in the twenty-five cents. Nozick then asks what right does the state have to take that money people voluntarily put into the box for the player. Nozicks point then being, all transfers of money at the game were voluntary and the state has no right to tax you for anything other then for

    Read More

  • John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.

    Read More

  • The Philosophies Of John Rawls Vs. Nozick

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nozick agrees with the liberty principle proposed by Rawls, but he disagrees with the equality principle and the fashion in which resources are distributed. I believe the historical principle of distribution is one strength of Nozick’s ideas. The historical principle of distribution states that the justice of any distribution does not depend on how closely it resembles any form of an equality pattern but how the distribution came about (959). I also agree with the theory that people are entitled to anything they acquired voluntarily and anything that is transferred to them voluntarily (958). Nozick does not agree with redistribution of wealth because taking resources from one person to benefit others is not necessarily voluntary. The biggest weaknesses of Nozick’s idea of equality comes from the idea that taxation and federally funded programs would be unjust forcing everything to be owned privately. This creates the most issues because people are self-interested and the virtue of market may not create the balance which Nozick proposed. Public school systems and public roads being deemed illegitimate would create issues with access. Also, making taxation illegal would make it difficult to have services like a police force, fire department, court system, or penal system because they would have to be paid by the individual directly. The police and court systems could become corrupt

    Read More

  • Distributive Justice By Robert Nozick And John Rawls

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e achieved when the Liberty and Difference Principle are enacted with the veil of ignorance. On the contrary, Nozick argues that Rawls’s theory is exactly the sort of patterned principle that infringes upon individual liberty. As an alternative, Nozick provides his unpatterned principle as the ideal distribution of goods in a society. To me, Rawls’s argues his theory in a manner where his principles of justice are not only difficult to achieve, but ultimately are exceedingly deficient in providing general utility. The veil of ignorance has proved to be almost impossible as well as unethical. The Difference Principle in itself is unable to justly distribute property since it clearly violates an individual’s liberty. Since Rawls’s method of distributive justice is rendered unreasonable and inefficient, it leaves us with a clear answer derived from two disjunctions.

    Read More

  • The Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. The veil of ignorance eliminates arbitrary advantages by setting up a fair initial contract situation. Without the veil of ignorance, there would be little chance of an outcome that is unbiased and based on equality of all. If societies were to be constructed without the veil of ignorance or the original position, everyone in the society would be motivated by fear of power and threat. These individuals would be living in a society that is unjust and unfair because most people would be looking to further their own individual goals at the expense of others. Therefore, living with the veil and the original position is better than living without it because people will be all given an equal opportunity in life, be treated fairly and live in a society that encourages cooperation and prevents conflict.

    Read More

More about Essay On Self Ownership

Open Document