Essay On Kleist's Das Erdbeben In Chili

2637 Words6 Pages

Kleist’s novella Das Erdbeben in Chili presents nothing but meaningless destruction. Discuss. Kleist’ novella Das Erdbeben in Chili was possibly his first attempt to write a story (Stephens, 1994: 194).This cannot be confirmed but it was completed after his plays such as Die Familie Schroffenstein. Kleist was known for challenging forms of writing and the ideals created by people (Pan, 2001; 49). The society of the time was very controlled by the Roman Catholic Church. There was no such thing as appealing a verdict of a court. The ruling was absolute. The death penalty was a punishment reserved for what was considered the worst crimes; heresy was one of these, proving that the state and church are very closely linked at the time. Kleist explores …show more content…

One possible reason for this is that the Nazca plate and the North American plate are on a destructive plate boundary. As this suggests the plates collide and land is lost as one plate is forced under the other to melt into the mantle again. This is the logical reason for the earthquake. It is not a completely random event that the earthquake struck at that time. Tension builds up and it has to be released. Even though there was destruction at this plate boundary another plate boundary is moving a part creating new land. This lets people see how there is potential to start again and fix the inequalities and immorality in the world. This is a very clever ploy by Kleist and is undoubtedly intentional. There are similarities to the Lisbon earthquake such as the hangings to keep order after the earthquake ‘...wie der Vizekönig in den schrecklichsten Augenblicken hätte müssen Galgen aufrichten lassen, um der Dieberei Einhalt zu tun...’ (Kleist and Kleist, 1984: 57). The Lisbon earthquake could have been used as a European alternative and Kleist knew of it but he chose the earthquake in …show more content…

sah man Menschen von allen Ständen durcheinander liegen, Fürsten und Bettner, Matronen und Bäuerinnen, Staatsbeamte und Taglöhner,Klosterherren und Klosterfrauen: einander bemitleiden, sich wechselseitig Hülfe reichen, von dem, was sie zur Erhaltung ihres Lebens gerettet haben mochten, freudig mitteilen, als b das allgemeine Unglück alles, was ihm entronnen war, zu einer Familie gemacht hätte.’ (Kleist and Kleist, 1984:

Open Document