Essay On Discourse Community

1428 Words3 Pages

The Trust of a Discourse Community
How do groups of people in our society all interact with each other? There are so many different ways people communicate, whether by writing, speaking, or even educating. As John Swales, James Paul Gee, and James E. Porter express, it all has to do with the concept and involvement of a discourse community. The process of common goals and purposes being constructed with the knowledge gathered in a discourse community and expanded by literacy, linguistics, and experience. The authors, Swales, Gee, and Porter, all emphasize key characteristics that they believe best describe a discourse community. Yet, their characterization leaves behind a controversy on both legitimate control and trust a discourse community …show more content…

Swales, Gee and Porter all give their understanding of how they believe a discourse community operates and contributes to society. It can be seen as a type of language used to connect between particular groups and integrate social identities into the world (Gee 484). The building of a discourse community starts with creating a type of communication plan. It is necessary that all members connect and confer alike in order to maintain a set of documented decisions and actions. A discourse community connects people to a lifestyle and provides a form of order that stretches the interconnections of words, writings, values, attitudes, and beliefs (Swales 220). Those interconnecting contacts though sometimes conflict with select purposes of other discourses, leading to confusion or even anarchy. When this occurs, awareness and a choice of acceptance or doubt sets into place (Porter 400). For a discourse community to continue all doubt and awareness have to be tracked and suppressed. The discourse community needs to insure that its values are well convinced and received by its members and potential new members, in order to remain accepted in a …show more content…

Handling the problem of mushfaking and spies, the discourse community has to keep tabs on everything going on around and make sure all members are act appropriately. This can lead to forms of judgment and rapid insight being placed on the members behind locked doors. This can cause a disconnect between what the members know and what they do. Gee expands on how being in a discourse means actively complying with all of their values (490). The idea of all or nothing, that if a member is not fully involved then the member is not part of the discourse. Swales brings up this idea with his six criteria, in which if all six characteristics are not implemented into the discourse community then the group is not an authentic discourse (222). The Initiation of members is hard because a discourse has to look out for spies. They look for how strongly a member is willing to cooperate and how much they want to connect with the group. People choose to join a discourse community but a discourse will choose the people based off their true collective ideas and true intentions. The act of mushfaking keeps a member from being all connected to the group, thus keeps them from contributing to common goals or values the community

Open Document