Essay On Democracy And Terrorism

854 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How do war and terrorism affect civil liberties

This statement from President Bush in the stance of the 9/11 assaults elaborate democracy is in contradiction of to terrorism, for the reason that freedom and fear in this quote is like that freedom in the means of democracy as well as fear in the means of terrorism are intended as meanings for democracy and terrorism. They both eliminate each other, which distinguish that only some can win from both of them namely democracy and terrorism. The strategy of the United States of America afterward the incidence of 9/11 is grounded on the impression that democracy decreases as well as minimizes terrorism. Then, the disagreement drives that the states as well as nations like Afghanistan and Iraq should be twisted into republics. Nevertheless does democracy actually decrease the opportunity and scope of terrorism as well as do democracies and republics become a minor target of the existence of terrorists as compared to non-democratic states and elaborates that what occurs to a democratic regime or a state next it is targeted by terrorists? The one more basic question which arise that do the core and basic values of democracy tend to be greater and little necessary in these types of consequences as well as how to overcome and face with these all stuff. These are certain stimulating and applicable questions, as democracy is at the core of the values of the Western domain. It is therefore vital to get much nearly the role of democracy as well as terrorism. The objective is to gain an understandable concept and model about terrorism and role of democracy, or to appeal consideration to the wider political significances of terrorism.
Central Research Question:
The central research question of the research paper is that Does the incident of ...

... middle of paper ...

...ell as laws are strained through anti-terrorism regulation because it is not possible to differentiate amongst criminality and offence and deeds of violence and the second means namely downstream because of the not possibility to discriminate amongst criminality and slight turbulences of community. Equivalence is confronted for the reason that the states not able to treat minorities who belongs from any other states or neighboring states as well as from any other beliefs equally like they treat their own citizens while Efficacy is challenged by costs a huge amount of capital for safeguarding the inhabitant as well as for their security for securing from imminent violence deprived of flawless the information around the effectiveness of these type of actions. So these all are the haubrich point of view that how the core values of democratic states affect by terrorism.

Show More
Related

  • Irrational Terrorism Essay

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Berlin And Pettit

    2421 Words  | 5 Pages

    Laws have the capacity to infringe civil liberties however they also provide a forum for its creation and development. For Berlin, his conception of liberty is based upon the idea of positive and negative freedoms. Liberty according to Berlin is viewed as freedom from interference; therefore laws which respect our freedoms are preferable as they allow for different paths of self-actualization. Pettit however considers liberty in terms of freedom from domination and considers the role laws and democracy can play in assuring individual freedoms. In addition to considering the respective approaches of Berlin and Pettit, their theories will also be considered in relation to terrorism. By considering their respective arguments in the context of terrorism, it becomes important to conceptualize laws not in terms of those which respect or interfere with our freedom, but rather how they are able to balance the competing interests of security and individual freedoms.

    Read More

  • Is State Terrorism '?: Is State Terrorism A Valid Concept?

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    The concept of state terrorism is highly debated. The main opposition to state-terrorism declares that states have legitimate monopoly over violence, therefore, state-violence cannot be considered terrorism (Lacquer). Furthermore, conceptualizing particular properties of state-terrorism has furthered complicated the debate. For instance, should state-terrorism constitute external conflict or internal conflict; also is the normative strength of non-state violence as compelling as

    Read More

  • Emergency Powers

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the war on terror, it is observed that many democratic states have restricted liberties by applying the so-called “emergency powers” to deal with terrorism. Emergency powers derived from the preventive security laws allows the government to safeguard the security of the state while limiting the damage to liberty and democracy. As Paul Wilkinson remarks, “In countering terrorism, the democratic state confronts an inescapable dilemma. It has to deal effectively with the terrorist threat to citizens and the state itself without destroying basic civil rights, the democratic process, and the rule of law.”

    Read More

  • Terrorism and Morality by Haig Khatchadourian

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    In “Terrorism and Morality,” Haig Khatchadourian argues that terrorism is always wrong. Within this argument, Khatchadourian says that all forms of terrorism are wrong because the outcome deprives those terrorized of their basic humanity. To this end, Khatchadourian says that even forms of terrorism that are designed to bring about a moral good are wrong because of the methods used to achieve that good. Before Khatchadourian spells out why terrorism is wrong, he defines what terrorism is, what causes terrorism, and what people believe terrorism to mean. With a working definition in place, Khatchadourian examines terrorism’s role in a just war and shows that terrorism is never just, even during war. With the assertion that terrorism, even during wartime is unjust, Khatchadourian analyzes the variations of innocence and non-innocence surrounding the victims of a terrorist attack. The analysis of innocence and non-innocence is accomplished through review of the principal of discrimination and the principal of proportion and how each relates to terrorism. From these philosophical and ethical standpoints, Khatchadourian finds that terrorism is unjust and wrong because of the way it groups and punishes the innocent with the guilty, not allowing the victim to properly respond to the charges against them. Finally, Khatchadourian looks at how terrorism is always wrong because of the way it denies a person their basic human rights. In examination of person’s human rights, Khatchadourian finds that terrorism specifically “violates its targets’ right to be treated as moral persons,” as it inflicts pain, suffering and death to those who are not deserving (298).

    Read More

  • Essay On Al Qaeda

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    Al Qaeda, the organization that the United States is in a constant, never ending battle with, the organization that has made the most impact and changed the United States forever. Al Qaeda is always making headlines with their terrorist attacks, the most known attack September 11th, 2001. This essay is about the terrorist group Al Qaeda, its history and background, Osama bin Laden, their well-known leader, and the major attacks on America.

    Read More

  • Comparing Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Crime And Punishment

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, the Russian word kramola or kramol’nik (sedition or any form of revolt) has been interchangeably used with fanatik (fanatic), zlodei (evil-doer), and zloumyshlennik (evil-thinker) (9). Therefore, in Russian law, a terrorist is not only one who enacts a deed but also a person who thinks and spreads the idea of it. In its most basic form, terrorism is “a frontal assault on any moral, political, or social” order (11). Through the use of violence, terrorists “provoke consciousness” and “evoke certain feelings of sympathy”; and, it is the people’s consciousness of their own grievance that allows for the rise of terrorism. (11).

    Read More

  • Organized Crime And Terrorism Essay

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Terrorism has successfully been able to flourish due to the three main types of terrorism (Revolutionary, Religious and Separatist/Anti-colonist). By means of a bigger purpose, these various reasons for terrorism have created a bigger sense of fear for the public. Knowing what is happing, how it can be explained is a good way of assessing the issue of terrorism. It forms a coping organism for the government in regarding to creating prevention legislation. But unlike organized crime, terrorism has been proven to be difficult to control due to the foreign powers controlling it. It is a serious issue in America, and the World that America is a part

    Read More

  • Does Democracy Work?

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”

    Read More

  • Are Democratic States More Peaceful?

    2382 Words  | 5 Pages

    Democratic states are perceived to be more peaceful because “democracies do not attack each other.” The proposition that democracies never (or rarely; there is a good deal of variation about this) go to war against one another has nearly become a truism. Since Michael Doyle’s essay in 1983 pointed out that no liberal democracy has ever fought a war with another democracy , scholars have treated pacifism between as democracies, “as closest thing we have to an empirical law in international relations.” The democratic peace proposition encourages hope for a new age of international peace. Over the years since Michael Doyle’s essay a lot of literature has been written about “democratic peace theory”. A lot of analysis has focused on the claim- that liberal democracies do not fight each one another. There is a lot of action- reaction sequence in the academic arguments. As an idea catches on it accumulates adherents. The more popular an idea, there is more likehood of a critical reaction that raises serious and strong reservations about the validity of the new idea. In this essay, I would like to examine the claim- that democratic states are more peaceful as democracy causes peace. In this essay I draw on the writings of John M. Owen, Michael Doyle, Christopher Layne, Mansfield and Snyder, Alexander Wendt, Robert Keohane and Lisa Martin for their views on why democracies do not fight one another and then deduce my own conclusions.

    Read More

  • Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?

    1685 Words  | 4 Pages

    Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. “ This is a popular quote regarding the state of terrorism, and how certain people may consider terrorism justifiable. Justifying terrorism is, however, not different from justifying innocent slaughter.

    Read More

  • Investigative Problem Essay

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most significant feature of an investigative study is the precision and simplicity of the investigative problem. For a brief assertion, it definitely has a great deal of influence on the study. The statement of the problem is the central position of the study. The problem statement should affirm what will be studied, whether the study will be completed by means of experimental or non-experimental analysis, and what the reason and function of the results will bring. As an element of the opening, profound problem declarations satisfies the query of why the study should to be performed. The reason of this essay is to discuss the features of an investigative problem; in addition, the essay will center on what constitutes a researchable problem; the components of a well formed Statement of Research Problem; and, what constitutes a reasonable theoretical framework for the need of a study.

    Read More

  • Poverty And Terrorism Essay

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the theoretical consideration I mention above, my hypothesis would be that people’s economic condition (poverty) has no direct relationship with people’s participation and support for terrorism. As I mention above, people cannot determine the exact role poverty plays in determining terrorism. For example, educational level can work as a cofounding variable between poverty and terrorism since low educational level can both cause poverty and terrorism according to some studies. Also it is very hard for us to determine the position of political variables. For example, political repression and instability can both cause poverty and terrorism. As political instability increases, poverty and terrorism both increase. Under this circumstance,

    Read More

  • Democracy as the Best Form of Government

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Democracy has come to mean a principle under whose flag has most of the developed countries aced in their race for Imperialism. It has gone beyond all previous governing systems and has made room for progress and development. By offering free and fair elections, democracy has redefined human dignity and patriotism. It has also helped to improve decision-making among the citizens, and brought down the crime level. Democracy is for sure the most fitting among the other types of government, and needs to be implemented fully for effective functioning of a state.

    Read More

  • Terrorism In Pakistan Essay

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pakistan is the basis in the international fight against terrorism to this day. Many Pakistani terrorist groups have made many terrorist attacks around the world. Pakistan faced the choice siding with or staying against the United States during the aftermath of 9/11. Violence in Pakistan has increased for many years as terrorist groups have targeted many political leaders, tribal leaders, the military, and also schools. Pakistan is divided into people who see the country as modern and/o...

    Read More

More about Essay On Democracy And Terrorism

Open Document