Essay On Customs Union

1098 Words3 Pages

A. Commission Communication COM(2012) 1- ) What are the factors for the success of EU Customs Union? The world's largest trading block, and a global competitor, a growing trade volume and speed of all the controversial success of the EU Customs Union of the EU can be considered as indicators of continued success. This is supported trade and economic growth, and safety, security, health and environmental protection. Last 500 million EU citizens four years, the customs union always new tasks, adapt to new geographical sizes, and changing global conditions, enforced. Last responsibilities successfully in ten years, but also successful co-operation and EU-wide coordination of IT systems and processes that require applied to each other. Today, 27 national governments to share the burden of managing the customs union, and they are really a single 'entity' to apply its own rules, it is expected by stakeholders. The other one is that Customs therefore increasing public health, consumer protection, environment and agriculture, for example, the implementation of the relevant legislation, including a comprehensive "guardian of the internal market as" serving. Growing pressure on the performance of the external environment in recent years has created a customs union. An ever-growing trade flows, new and increasingly complex supply chains and business models (e.g. e-commerce), as well as larger volumes of new logistics and competitive pressures, faster, and more and more complex means an environment. 2. What are the objectives for the future of Customs Union ? These are the objectives for the future of Customs Union: • Meet the challenges of the operational objective of this Communication services in the EU by 2020, and a better performanc... ... middle of paper ... ...cle 9 does not accept the claim of violation of Article 9 of each product type is treated separately, and nothing in this context. Claim to be disproportionate in relation to the legislation, the French Government fines 'systematic' is applied, and observes that it does not accept nor disproportionate. The French Government contests the violation of Article 34 TFEU, and the second on defense puts forward the following arguments: The French government is clearly constitute a quantitative restriction on imports of Article 575 H set to accept restrictions, despite the measures so far at the same time justify the claim that objective such as the protection of human health and life, as foreseen in Article 36 TFEU, as well as the protection of human health and life, to make a difference in the treatment of arbitrary or stated did not constitute a disproportionate measure.

Open Document