Essay On Chernobyl

977 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Chernobyl disaster risk assessment

Study of the Nuclear Disaster of Chernobyl The worst accident in the history of this nuclear power generation occurred on the morning of April 26, 1986. It was at the Chernobyl (Ukraine) nuclear power station in the Soviet Union. At 1:32AM Lieutenant Colonel Leonid Telyatnikov received a telephone call and was told that there was a fire at the nuclear power plant. There were many reasons their plant had backfired. These reasons included human error and poor plant design due to the cold war. Chernobyl was located in the former Soviet Union in what is now Ukraine. The area in and around Chernobyl is now a nuclear wasteland. People are not supposed to live in these areas, yet they still do, even with the danger of mutations and radiation sickness. For the people and countries affected by the radiation, this was a horrible, terrifying and angering experience. Villages were evacuated late and not many things were done in time to save lives and prevent more damages. Countless errors were made at Chernobyl. The man in charge, an electrical engineer, was not a specialist in reactor plants. There were also the problems with the plant's organization and design. Due to the cold war, the Soviet Union had poor designs for nuclear plants. The sequence of events before the explosion is still unclear. Technicians attempted a poorly designed experiment, causing the chain reaction in the core to go out of control. The reactor's lid was blown off, and large amounts of radioactive material were released into the atmosphere. A partial meltdown of the core also occurred. It is believed that for some strange reason, there was a loss of water that was used to cool 1,661 uranium fuel assemblies that were set in pressure pipes surrounded by 1,700 tons... ... middle of paper ... ...s demonstrated at Chernobyl. Chernobyl was the worst accident in the history of power plants. There were still reactors running until recently. Greenpeace spoke out against it with a powerful quote, “Chernobyl is a time bomb: every day that this reactor operates it becomes more dangerous", said Tobias Muenchmeyer, Greenpeace nuclear expert. To avoid further accidents, people that work at nuclear plants should be careful with what they do. The government should also have the ability to step in and shut down a plant that is unstable and poses a problem to the community. For the good of out world, workers should be supervised more carefully and all leaks and problems should be reported to a higher authority. The public should also be warned because if they know that they live around an unstable power plant, they will take precautions and perhaps move to a safer area.

Show More
Related

  • An Analysis Of Visit Sunny Chernobyl

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    The engineers in Visit Sunny Chernobyl created a new frontier past the safety zone because they want to test the limits of the reactor. What the scientists didn’t account for is that fact that the reactors already had the potential of a dangerous chain reaction. (Blackwell 6) Consequently, their boundary destroying led to catastrophic consequences and the total annihilation of a land area because of massive radiation. Blackwell thought Chernobyl was so horrific he expressed that no one should visit without a “working understanding of radiation and how it’s measured” (Blackwell 7). These are some horrific consequences that followed from surpassing the

    Read More

  • Chernobyl: One of the Greatest Accidents the World Would Learn From

    1730 Words  | 4 Pages

    The series of events that occurred on April 26th, 1986 at the Chernobyl Power Plant located in the Ukraine, would be considered one of the worst disasters that the world would ever see. It was supposed to be a routine check “to determine how long the steam-driven turbines at the plant would continue to generate electricity in the event of an electrical blackout” (Worsnop). This seems ironic because a simple test led to such a complicated calamity. During the test, one of the turbines was shut off and the emergency core cooling system was turned off as well. For a simple test, turning off the emergency core cooling system all together might not have one of the best options. They were running the core at low power and by doing so it caused excess xenon to accumulate. By reducing the water flow to the core, the core stared to heat up rapidly causing the reactor power to increase. Finally, they figured that they should remove the control rods from the reactor core as an emergency shutdown method. However, all the events leading up to this point did the opposite of shutting...

    Read More

  • What Can We Learn From the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident?

    3299 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the early morning of March 28th 1979, the nuclear plant located on Three Mile Island in southeastern Pennsylvania was operating as usual. The plant itself had been operating for nearly a decade without incident. Around 4pm, a mechanical failure within the cooling system of the reactor occurred. This failure resulted in cooling water failing to flow adequately to cool the reactor. This resulted in the cooling water to be heated beyond safe operating limits of the process. As the cooling water heated, some of the liquid was converted to steam that increased the pressure within unit. Operators in the plant realized that cooling system had failed and began taking steps to protect the reactor and safely shut it down. In order to release the pressure from the cooling system and the reactor, the opening of an operator controlled pressure relief valve was required. This valve was opened using the control systems available to the operators, not through manually opening the valve as the valv...

    Read More

  • Chernobyl: The Unforgettable Engineering Disaster

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leading the disaster, Nuclear reactors require an element cooling with a particular finished objective to uproot the created warmth delivered by radioactive rote. Despite when not delivering power, reactors still make some warmth, which must be cleared with a specific end goal to forestall harm to the reactor center. Cooling is by and large refined through fluid stream, water in Chernobyl s case. The issue at the Chernobyl plant was that taking after an emergency shutdown of all force, diesel generators were expected to run the cooling pumps. These generators took around a minute to fulfill full speed, which was respected an inadmissible long time for the reactor to be without cooling. It was recommended that the rotational power of the backing off steam

    Read More

  • Could the Chernobyl Disaster Have Been Prevented?

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ad a grudge from the Cold War. More importantly, the absence of a containment structure is especially important. As pointed out by Rhodes article about Chernobyl, "Post-accident analyses indicate that if there had been U.S.-style containment, none of the radioactivity would have escaped, and there would have been no injuries or deaths" (Rhodes "Chernobyl", PBS). Chernobyl wouldn’t have been the traumatic event that it was if the Soviets were technologically advanced and obviously, if they trained their personnel that managed radioactive materials. In the end the stubbornness of the Soviets was an important aspect of Chernobyl as it stopped them from asking for help and the prevailing operating philosophy at the time in the Soviet Union, which did not trust automation and relied on operators who did not understand the process turned out bring about this upheaval.

    Read More

  • Three Mile Island Incident

    607 Words  | 2 Pages

    March 28, 1979 at 4:00 A.M., a malfunction in the electrical or mechanical components in the nonnuclear side of TMI-2 started the Three Mile Island Incident. The main feed water pump that is designed to cool the core of the reactor failed to send water. The turbine generator had no other option than to cut off. Pressure in the nuclear side built

    Read More

  • Summary Of Visit Sunny Chernobyl

    148 Words  | 1 Pages

    Every since the industrial revolution, society has moved to jobs, factories, manufacturing goods and products, and larger cities. This process called industrialization is when an economy modifies its way of living from an agriculture based living to the production of merchandise in factories. The manual labor that is required for farm work is replaced with mass production on assembly lines. Andrew Blackwell visits this idea of industrialization in Visit Sunny Chernobyl but to a higher extent. Blackwell states “today that society is an industrial one, resource hungry and plant-spanning, growing so inefficiently large, we believe that it is disrupting its own host… It’s not just about living sustainably. It’s about being able to live with ourselves,”

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Atomic Bomb

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    As with everything, problems occurred during the development process. The plutonium needed for the bombs was only in microscopic sizes, which was very difficult to handle. Plutonium’s properties were unknown, and scientists knew very little about uranium 235. The plants needed to be run by machinery because the materials were “radioactive, poisonous, violently corrosive, or all three” (Gerdes 143).

    Read More

  • The Effects of Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster on Humans and the Environment

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The tops are leaping off the reactor lip" this was the first warning which the control room received before the destructive explosion in Chernobyl that occurred at 1:23 AM local time. Twenty three minute after the warning in the morning of 26 April 1989, the reactor exploded. The Chernobyl nuclear accident was an unexpected catastrophe that can happen in the history of producing nuclear power. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defined a nuclear accident as an accident that includes any activities that lead to the release of radioactive material and causes significant consequences. The location of Chernobyl city is in the north of Ukraine near the Belarus border. That nuclear accident happened when in reactor number 4 in the Chernobyl nuclear power in the Soviet Union exploded. Because of that extreme explosion, the radioactive emissions dispensed into the environment and caused immediate deaths, illnesses and many health problems. World Health Association (2013) reports that during the accident, one person died immediately and another one died in the hospital due to the harmful injuries he received. Health World Organization (WHO) (2006) also reports that a few weeks after the disaster 28 people died because of the Acute Radiation Sickness(ARS). The Chernobyl nuclear accident is one of the major disasters in the history of nuclear power which had many serious effects on humans and the environment.

    Read More

  • Chernobyl

    451 Words  | 1 Pages

    Chernobyl was the greatest nuclear disaster of the 20th century. On April 26th, 1986, one of four nuclear reactors located in the Soviet Union melted down and contaminated a vast area of Eastern Europe. The meltdown, a result of human error, lapsed safety precautions, and lack of a containment vessel, was barely contained by dropping sand and releasing huge amounts of deadly radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere. The resulting contamination killed or injured hundreds of thousands of people and devastated the environment. The affects of this accident are still being felt today and will be felt for generations to come.

    Read More

  • Environmental Disaster: The Chernobyl Disaster

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the most significant environmentally damaging instances in history was the Chernobyl incident. In 1986, the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant in Ukraine exploded. It became one of the most significant disasters in the engineering community. There are different factors that contributed to the disaster. The personnel that were tasked with operating the plant were unqualified. The plant’s design was a complex one. The RBMK reactor was Soviet design, and the staff had not be acquainted with this particular design. As the operators performed tests on the reactor, they disabled the automatic shutdown mechanism. After the test, the attempt to shut down the reactor was unsuccessful as it was unstable. This is the immediate cause of the Chernobyl Accident. It later became the most significant nuclear disaster in the history of the

    Read More

  • Cooling Systems in Nuclear Reactors

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    The basic fuel for a nuclear power plant is uranium. The reactor core is what contains the radioactive material in a nuclear power plant. This radioactive material will continue to give off heat for a long time, and unless this heat is removed, it will build up and will eventually cause damage to the radioactive fuel or the reactor. The nuclear reactor coolant, as described above, consists of water, gas, or a liquid metal. This coolant is circulated through the reactor core and absorbs the heat that is generated and turns it into steam. This steam becomes pressurized and causes the turbines to turn along with the generator, which generates electricity. Figure 1 shows the flow of the coolant (in this case, water) indicated by the arrows and the color of the water represents the waters form. The water is cool as it is pumped from the condenser into the containment structure. As the water circulates in the containment structure, it is heated in the reactor core and cooled again in the steam generator. The heat from the water is released as steam and the steam is pressurized to move the turbines. The movement of the t...

    Read More

  • Why Nuclear Power Plants Need to be Shut Down

    574 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Disaster of Fukushima shows that nuclear energy is highly unsafe so, all around the world need to learn from the accident in Fukushima. We need to realize this accident can happen anywhere in the world." (Rianne Tuele, Radiation expert in Green Peace). Originally nuclear energy announced as an alternative energy that is cheap, clean, and safe compare to other existing energy. Therefore, some people insist the nuclear power plants must be kept open but, I disagree with three reasonable safety reasons.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Power: Dirty, Dangerous and Expensive

    3279 Words  | 7 Pages

    The energy industry is beginning to change. In today’s modern world, governments across the globe are shifting their focuses from traditional sources of power, like the burning coal and oil, to the more complex and scientific nuclear power supply. This relatively new system uses powerful fuel sources and produces little to no emissions while outputting enough energy to fulfill the world’s power needs (Community Science, n.d.). But while nuclear power seems to be a perfect energy source, no power production system is without faults, and nuclear reactors are no exception, with their flaws manifesting in the form of safety. Nuclear reactors employ complex systems involving pressure and heat. If any of these systems dysfunctions, the reactor can leak or even explode releasing tons of highly radioactive elements into the environment. Anyone who works at or near a nuclear reactor is constantly in danger of being exposed to a nuclear incident similar to the ones that occurred at the Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi plants. These major accidents along with the unresolved problems with the design and function of nuclear reactors, as well as the economic and health issues that nuclear reactors present serve to show that nuclear energy sources are not worth the service that they provide and are too dangerous to routinely use.

    Read More

  • Essay On Chernobyl Disaster

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    On April26, 1986, the nuclear power plant was exploded in Chernobyl, Ukraine. At 1:23 AM, while everyone were sleeping, Reactor #4 exploded, and 40 hours later, all the city residence were forcefully moved to other cities, and they never return to their home. The Chernobyl disaster is ranked the worst nuclear accident. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant was ran by the Soviet Union central nuclear energy corporation. (International Atomic Energy Agency-IAEA, 2005)

    Read More

More about Essay On Chernobyl

Open Document